scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Miquel Sánchez published in 1999"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that since revisit and mortality rates constitute good health care quality markers, present data demonstrate that ED overcrowding implies a decrease in the health carequality provided by it.
Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the influence of overcrowding on health care quality provided by emergency departments (ED). The study was carried out in an urban, university tertiary care hospital. All patients seen at the internal medicine unit (IMU) of the ED who returned during the following 72 hours, and those who died in the ED rooms were included in the study. During a consecutive period of 2 years (104 weeks), we prospectively quantified the number of weekly visits, revisits and deaths. We calculated revisit and mortality rates (in respect of percentage of all visited patients) for each week. Correlation between the number of weekly visits, and revisit and mortality rates was assessed using a simple linear regression model. We consigned 81,301 visits, 1137 revisits and 648 deaths; mean (+/- SD) number of weekly visits, revisits and deaths were 782 (68), 10.93 (3.97) and 6.23 (3.04) respectively; weekly revisit rate was 1.40% (0.48%) and weekly mortality rate was 0.79% (0.36%). We observed a significant, positive correlation between mortality rates and weekly number of visits (p = 0.01). Although a similar trend was also found for revisit rates, such an increase did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). It is concluded that since revisit and mortality rates constitute good health care quality markers, present data demonstrate that ED overcrowding implies a decrease in the health care quality provided by it.

263 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: The revisit rate in an emergency department (ED), to define the clinical and epidemiological profile of revisited patients, and to identify influencing factors for revisits is relatively low.
Abstract: BACKGROUND To known the revisit rate in an emergency department (ED), to define the clinical and epidemiological profile of revisited patients, and to identify influencing factors for revisits. PATIENTS AND METHODS During one year period, we included all revisited patients returning to ED before 72 h of a previous discharge from medical unit of ED. As controls we included the next patient seen after every case being discharged. We compiled clinical and epidemiological data from both groups. For revisited patients, we identify the cause of the revisit, changes in diagnosis and/or treatment, diagnosis mistakes and final destination of the patient. RESULTS We identified 406 revisits (revisit rate: 1.42%). Multivariate analysis disclosed, as positive predictive factors for revisit, and age over 60 years (p = 0.006), male sex (p = 0.02), visit performed at level 2 (severe diseases) (p = 0.02), initial assessment by junior resident (p = 0.01), number of complementary procedures higher than 2 (p = 0.01) and gastrointestinal disease as diagnosis after the first visit (p = 0.03). On the other hand, dermatologic symptoms as initial complaint and unspecific symptoms (p = 0.01) were negative predictors for revisit. In only 16% of cases, the revisit did not imply changes in the diagnosis or treatment. Revisits were due to disease-related factors in 34% of cases, physician-related factors in 33%, patients-related factors in 10%, system-related factors in 3% and there were no relationship with the previous visit in 15% (in 5% of cases the cause was unassessable). The diagnosis error most frequently seen was "nonspecific abdominal syndrome". Seventy six percent of revisited patients were admitted. CONCLUSIONS The revisit rate in our ED is relatively low. Patients being revisited have well-defined clinical and epidemiological profile. The majority of revisited patients require to be admitted.

21 citations



Journal Article
TL;DR: Although the annual mortality rate has progressively increased in ED, family satisfaction with the received care is good, and the clinical profile of patient dying at ED is an individual of advanced age, with a poor quality of life, and in whom the death was expected when arrived to ED.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES To define the mortality pattern in a medical unit of emergency department (ED) and to know the satisfaction of relatives with ED provided care. PATIENTS AND METHODS We computed the number of patients visited and dead from 1989 to 1996. From all patients dying during 1996, we recorded clinical and epidemiological data and we interviewed the patients' family to know their satisfaction with ED provided care. RESULTS Whole mortality rate was 0.71 (0.15)% X (SD) with an annual increase of 10.4% (r = 0.78, p < 0.05). The clinical profile of patient dying at ED is an individual of advanced age, with a poor quality of life, and in whom the death was expected when arrived to ED. From the family interview, 61% of cases preferred that their relative was dying in the hospital, and 88% were satisfied with ED provided care. CONCLUSIONS Although the annual mortality rate has progressively increased in ED, family satisfaction with the received care is good.

15 citations