Mirosław Kruszyński

TL;DR: In this article, the authors carried out a multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of 18 urban transportation projects, where at each level of the hierarchical decision problem different multiple criteria ranking sub-problems have been structured and solved with the application of AHP method, ELECTRE III/IV method and their combination.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented a multiple criteria evaluation of different redevelopment variants of a certain section of a major street in a medium-sized metropolitan area, which comprises different transportation solutions and concepts as well as distinct investments in transportation infrastructure.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the methodology of evaluating different mass transit systems (MTSs) operating in different European cities using MCDM/A. The evaluat ion of MTS-s is formulated as a multiple criteria ranking problem.

Abstract: The article presents the concept of “good governance” which is confronted with other models of city management applied by public administration, such as traditional public administration or new public management. The authors characterized major features of “good governance” promoted by the European Commission, and described in the White Paper of the European Governance. They further referred to the decision process focused on the selecting of (streetcars / trams) serving passengers in the public transport system in Poznan. The above described process has been carried out with the application of multicriteria and group decision making methodologies. Results were compared with the results of a public contract for the purchase of trams / streetcars based on traditional public management (bureaucratic model).