scispace - formally typeset
M

Mohamed-Chaker Larabi

Researcher at University of Poitiers

Publications -  185
Citations -  2305

Mohamed-Chaker Larabi is an academic researcher from University of Poitiers. The author has contributed to research in topics: Human visual system model & Image quality. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 175 publications receiving 2059 citations. Previous affiliations of Mohamed-Chaker Larabi include Centre national de la recherche scientifique.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A Perceptual Measure of Blocking Artifact for No-reference Video Quality Evaluation of H.264 Codec

TL;DR: The performance metrics, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients, indicate that the proposed method outperformed the approach recommended in the literature for block-based compression, and the improvement was even better for the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC standard.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Stereo image coding based on binocular energy modeling

TL;DR: This work proposes a stereoscopic coder based on visual properties computed by a binocular energy model based on the simple and complex cells functions allowing the fusion of both retinal images in the visual cortex.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

A Novel Approach for Constructing an Achromatic Contrast Sensitivity Function by Matching

TL;DR: The tests of this study are carried out under the conditions of medical diagnosis for radiographies with sinusoidal stimuli and the obtained results were approximated by a model in order to facilitate their integration in other models.
Proceedings Article

Comparison of subjective assessment protocols for digital cinema applications

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare subjective methodologies in the digital cinema framework and determine with a group of observers, which methodology is better for assessing digital cinema content and what is the annoyance level associated to each of them.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Comparative performance between human and automated face recognition systems, using CCTV imagery, different compression levels and scene parameters

TL;DR: Results show that the automated systems are more tolerant to compression than humans, and in automated systems, mixed brightness scenes were the most affected and low brightness Scenes were the least affected by compression.