scispace - formally typeset
M

Mohammed S. Gadelrab

Researcher at Centre national de la recherche scientifique

Publications -  10
Citations -  75

Mohammed S. Gadelrab is an academic researcher from Centre national de la recherche scientifique. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Botnet. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 9 publications receiving 57 citations.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Defining categories to select representative attack test-cases

TL;DR: This paper makes a thorough analysis of existing attack classifications in order to determine whether they could be helpful in selecting attack test cases, and constructs a new scheme to classify attacks relying on those attributes that appear to be the best classification criteria.

BotCap: Machine Learning Approach for Botnet Detection Based on Statistical Features

TL;DR: This research aims to overcome two serious limitations of current botnet detection systems: First, the need for Deep Packet Inspection-DPI and the need to collect traffic from several infected hosts.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Execution Patterns in Automatic Malware and Human-Centric Attacks

TL;DR: The analysis made on both automatic malware and human-centric attacks allowed us to construct a model for attack process that can aide in the generation of real attack scenarios and use it in the evaluation of Intrusion Detection Systems.
Journal ArticleDOI

Construction and remote calibration of an automated resistance measuring system

TL;DR: A fully automated system for the remote calibrations of resistances is described and the calibration of many resistors can be performed automatically through the Resistors Automatic Changer, controlled by a LabVIEW program developed and described in the present research work.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a new generation of digital calibration certificate: Analysis and survey

TL;DR: A thorough analysis of the calibration certificate and the calibration process can be found in this paper, where the authors provide an overview of the carried research on that point to help peer researchers to view the big picture and to avoid wasting their efforts in repeating same work on same ideas.