scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Mu-En Wu published in 2013"


Journal Article
08 Sep 2013-Science
TL;DR: In this article, a random trader uses all-in-all-out strategy to trade inthe market at random timing with capital being negligible ascompared with the market size.
Abstract: In this paper, we study the problem of benchmarking returns ofequity funds. We present a novel approach, the random-traderscheme, to benchmark return of an equity fund during a specificperiod. A random trader uses all-in-all-out strategy to trade inthe market at random timing with capital being negligible ascompared with the market size. Let $\mathrm{DRRT}$ denote the distribution of returns of randomtraders, and $\mathrm{R_{rt}}$ be a random variable sampled from$\mathrm{DRRT}$. In this paper we model $\mathrm{DRRT}$ as alog-normal distribution, denoted as $\mathrm{s_{DRRT}}$, andprovide an efficient algorithm to compute the mean and variance of$\mathrm{s_{DRRT}}$, denoted as $\mathrm{\mu_{DRRT}}$ and$\mathrm{\sigma_{DRRT}}$, respectively. Using TAIEX index as dataset, our experiments show that $\mathrm{s_{DRRT}}$ approximates$\mathrm{DRRT}$ well when the length of given period is one month. We then score each equity fund by the cumulative distributionfunction of $\mathrm{s_{DRRT}}$ i.e., $\mathrm{s}(m;\mathrm{DRRT) =Pr[R_{rt} \le R}(m)]$, where $\mathrm{R}(m)$ denotes the return of the equity fund $m$during the given period. Using the historical data on equity fundsin Taiwan, we observed interesting characteristics. When analyzingmonthly returns, although there are some winners who are able toachieve scores higher than $.9$ sometimes, it is difficult forthem to always keep up with the high scores. Moreover, few equityfunds showed the stability of scores higher than $.7$, whenanalyzing long-term returns. Furthermore, there are times whenmost funds obtain high scores. There are also times when no fundsperform well.

2 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
08 Sep 2013
TL;DR: In this paper, a random trader uses all-in-all-out strategy to trade in the market at random timing with capital being negligible as compared with the market size, and provides an efficient algorithm to compute the mean and variance of sDRRT, denoted as μDRRT and σDRRT respectively.
Abstract: In this paper, we study the problem of benchmarking returns of equity funds. We present a novel approach, the random-trader scheme, to benchmark return of an equity fund during a specific period. A random trader uses all-in-all-out strategy to trade in the market at random timing with capital being negligible as compared with the market size.In this paper, we study the problem of benchmarking returns of equity funds. We present a novel approach, the random-trader scheme, to benchmark return of an equity fund during a specific period. A random trader uses all-in-all-out strategy to trade in the market at random timing with capital being negligible as compared with the market size. Let DRRT be the distribution of returns of random traders, and Rrt be a random variable sampling from DRRT. In this paper we model DRRT as a log-normal distribution, denoted as sDRRT, and provide an efficient algorithm to compute the mean and variance of sDRRT, denoted as μDRRT and σDRRT, respectively. Using TAIEX index as data set, our experiments showed sDRRT approximates DRRT well when the length of given period is one month. We then score each equity fund by the cumulative distribution function of sDRRT i.e., s(m; DRRT) = Pr[Rrt ≤ R(m)] , where R(m) denotes the return of the equity fund m during the given period. Using the historical data on equity funds in Taiwan, we observed interesting characteristics. When analyzing monthly returns, although there are some winners who are able to achieve scores higher than .9 sometimes, it is difficult for them to always keep up at the high scores. However, few equity funds showed the stability of scores higher than .7, when analyzing long-term returns. Furthermore, there are times when most funds obtain high scores. There are also times when no funds perform well.