Porous materials for sound absorption

Building envelope insulation is crucial for an energy-efficient and comfortable indoor environment because the envelope accounts for 50–60% of total heat gain/loss in a building. Previous studies mostly used lifecycle cost as the criteria to select the optimum insulation materials with little or no consideration of embodied energy, emission, and summer overheating potential. This study presents a comparative analysis of building insulation materials properties (thermal, hygroscopic, acoustic, reaction to fire, environmental, and cost) and their performance in different climate zones and proposed an optimization framework. Insulation materials can be primarily categorized as conventional, state-of-the-art and sustainable. State-of-the-art insulation materials have the lowest thermal conductivity value amongst the three insulation types. However, their life cycle cost is higher compared to the other types. Sustainable insulation materials could be useful to delay and minimize indoor peak temperature and reduce overheating risk during the hot summer period. The analysis also showed that building walls with comparatively lower thermal resistance are more cost-effective for the cooling dominated region, but walls with higher thermal resistance are more cost-effective in heating-dominated regions. However, highly insulated and airtight houses may also lead to increased overheating risk and peak cooling demand during a hot summer period. In addition, hygroscopic, acoustic, and fire retardancy properties of insulation materials are critical to control indoor relative humidity in a humid region, to maintain a minimum noise level in a zone, and to reduce fire destruction. Hence, the optimization should include four criteria 1) Energy, 2) Environment, 3) Economic, and 4) Comfort.

Comparative analysis of building insulation material properties and performance

Natural composites can be fabricated through reinforcing either synthetic or bio-based polymers with hydrophilic natural fibers. Ultimate moisture absorption resistance at the fiber–matrix interface can be achieved when hydrophilic natural fibers are used to reinforce biopolymers due to the high degree of compatibility between them. However, the cost of biopolymers is several times higher than that of their synthetic counterparts, which hinders their dissemination in various industries. In order to produce economically feasible natural composites, synthetic resins are frequently reinforced with hydrophilic fibers, which increases the incompatibility issues such as the creation of voids and delamination at fiber–matrix interfaces. Therefore, applying chemical and/or physical treatments to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks is of primary importance. However, it is demonstrated through this review study that these treatments do not guarantee a sufficient improvement of the moisture absorption properties of natural composites, and the moisture treatments should be applied under the consideration of the following parameters: (i) type of hosting matrix; (ii) type of natural fiber; (iii) loading of natural fiber; (iv) the hybridization of natural fibers with mineral/synthetic counterparts; (v) implantation of nanofillers. Complete discussion about each of these parameters is developed through this study.

Critical Review of the Parameters Affecting the Effectiveness of Moisture Absorption Treatments Used for Natural Composites

In recent years, in an attempt to substitute the conventional synthetic sound absorption material, natural fibers and their sound absorption properties have been increasingly studied. This is due to the fact that conventional synthetic fiber has potential health risks for human beings and significant environmental impact. In this review, existing and newly emerging natural fiber sound absorbers are summarized and highlighted in three categories: raw material, fiber assembly and composite. The sound absorption mechanism, several widely used prediction models and the popular acoustic characterization methods are presented. The comparison of sound absorption properties between some natural sound absorbers and glass fiber is conducted in two groups, i.e., thin material and thick material. It is found that many natural fibers have comparable sound absorption performance, some of them can be the ideal alternatives to glass fiber, such as kapok fiber, pineapple-leaf fiber and hemp fiber. Last, the conclusion part of this review gives an outlook regarding the promotion of the commercial use of natural fiber by means of theoretical study, efficient and environmentally friendly pretreatment and Life Cycle Assessment.

Muhamad Haziq Hassan

Papers

Sound absorption of extracted pineapple-leaf fibres