scispace - formally typeset
N

Nan Yeld

Researcher at University of Cape Town

Publications -  6
Citations -  91

Nan Yeld is an academic researcher from University of Cape Town. The author has contributed to research in topics: Higher education & Academic achievement. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 6 publications receiving 89 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Educational Histories and Academic Potential: can tests deliver?

TL;DR: The Alternative Admissions Research Project at the University of Cape Town has developed, and performs research on, tests that indicate ability to cope with English medium academic education as discussed by the authors, which are used to provide additional access opportunities for students from disadvantaged educational backgrounds.
Journal ArticleDOI

A developmental approach to mathematics testing for university admissions and course placement

TL;DR: The Alternative Admissions Research Project at University of Cape Town has developed a mathematics test according to the dynamic testing approach as advocated by Miller (1990) for admission of African students from grossly under-resourced schools, as well as for placing these and other students into a diversifying first year curriculum as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Critical questions? Some responses to issues raised in relation to the national benchmark tests project

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an attempt to provide both schooling and higher education with important information on the competencies of exiting and entering students, information that does not duplicate the essential information delivered by the school-leaving examination, but provides an important extra dimension.
Journal ArticleDOI

Standard Setting Lessons Learned in the South African Context: Implications for International Implementation

TL;DR: In this article, the legacy of the apartheid era, in which segregation and discrimination were institutionalized, affects the attitudes of South Africans toward assessment and placing students into performance levels, as panelists were asked to make judgments related to students' likely performance in higher education.