scispace - formally typeset
N

Nathan C. Nussbaum

Researcher at New York University

Publications -  24
Citations -  929

Nathan C. Nussbaum is an academic researcher from New York University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Cancer & Lung cancer. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 23 publications receiving 454 citations. Previous affiliations of Nathan C. Nussbaum include Duke University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Association of Broad-Based Genomic Sequencing With Survival Among Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Community Oncology Setting.

TL;DR: Among patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer receiving care in the community oncology setting, broad-based genomic sequencing directly informed treatment in a minority of patients and was not independently associated with better survival.
Posted Content

Model-assisted cohort selection with bias analysis for generating large-scale cohorts from the EHR for oncology research.

TL;DR: Model-Ass Cohort Selection with bias analysis can significantly improve the efficiency of cohort selection on EHR data while instilling confidence that outcomes research performed on the resulting cohort will not be biased.
Journal ArticleDOI

Speed of Adoption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors of Programmed Cell Death 1 Protein and Comparison of Patient Ages in Clinical Practice vs Pivotal Clinical Trials.

TL;DR: Overall, similar proportions of older and younger patients received anti–PD-1 agents treatment during the first 9 months after FDA approval, however, there were significant differences in age between clinical trial participants and patients receiving anti-PD- 1 agents treatment in clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation analysis of a composite real-world mortality endpoint for patients with cancer in the United States.

TL;DR: Across all cancer types analyzed, this composite mortality variable showed high sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and ±15‐day agreement, and yielded median rwOS values modestly overestimated when compared to NDI‐based results.