scispace - formally typeset
N

Nedret Billor

Researcher at Auburn University

Publications -  43
Citations -  1275

Nedret Billor is an academic researcher from Auburn University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Outlier & Robust statistics. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 41 publications receiving 1096 citations. Previous affiliations of Nedret Billor include University of Sheffield.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators

TL;DR: This paper proposes a new general approach, based on the methods of Hadi (1992a,1994) and Hadi and Simonoff (1993) that can be computed quickly — often requiring less than five evaluations of the model being fit to the data, regardless of the sample size.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focused on the decomposition rates and chemical composition in pure pine ( Pinus taeda L.) and mixed pine-deciduous litter, which contained either 100% loblolly pine needles or 80% pine needles and 20% leaves of one of five deciduous species.
Journal ArticleDOI

Local influence: a new approach

TL;DR: In this paper, a new measure called local influence was proposed, which has the incidental benefit of being simpler to compute than the concept of local influence introduced by Cook, and is used to distinguish between the perturbations of the data and those of the model.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional outlier detection with robust functional principal component analysis

TL;DR: A robust functional principal component analysis is proposed to find the linear combinations of the original variables that contain most of the information, even if there are outliers and to flag functional outliers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of standard maximum likelihood classification and polytomous logistic regression used in remote sensing

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the results of 15 classifications using independent validation datasets, estimates of kappa and error, and a nonparametric analysis of variance derived from visually interpreted observations, Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper plus imagery, PLR, and traditional maximum likelihood classifications algorithms.