A system (100) for providing integrated detection and countermeasures against unmanned aerial vehicles(44) include a detecting element (103), a location determining element (104) and an interdiction element (102). The detecting element detects an unmanned aerial vehicle in flight in the region of, or approaching, a property, place, event or very important person. The location determining element determines the exact location of the unmanned aerial vehicle. The interdiction element can either direct the unmanned aerial vehicle away from the property, place, event or very important person in a non-destructive manner, or can cause disable the unmanned aerial vehicle in a destructive manner.

Deterrent for unmanned aerial systems

What is disclosed is a process and system for storing, combining, reporting and presenting data from multiple platforms. An embodiment of the present invention permits single or multiple platforms to present data for storage in a central database. Data may be added manually, imported in from another file or website, or may be created by applying a mathematical formula to a pre-existing set of data. This data, which forms a data set, may be further organized into data graphs, which may further be presented in a variety of different graphical representations. The different data sets and other visual representations may further organized by relevant topic into issue groups. According to one embodiment, the present invention will be displayed through a single interface accessible by any number of users through a network.

Process and system for tracking, combining and reporting on data from multiple organizations

The invention relates to a distributed electronic counter measures solution, wherein jamming signals (JA; JB) may be emitted towards threats (X1, X2) from counter measures stations in multiple vehicles (A, B), which are physically separated from one another in order to improve the chances of survival the vehicles (A, B) as well as any other vehicles that are associated with these vehicles (A, B) in a group of vehicles. The vehicles in the group exchange messages (D) over a wireless data link (L), where the messages (D) sent from a particular station specify an availability status (Dres-status) for each electronic warfare resource in the station and a threat status (Dthr-status) registered by the station. A station in the group having a central planning function coordinates any jamming signals (JA; JB) emitted from the electronic warfare resources of the stations in the group, such that the resources are optimally used with respect to all of any registered threats (X1, X2). This coordination is based on estimated geometric interrelationships between the at least two stations in the group; estimated geometric relationships between the at least two stations in the group and at least one registered threat (X1, X2); and the respective resources of each station in the group.

Optimized Utilization of Electronic Counter Measures

A system for providing integrated detection and countermeasures against unmanned aerial vehicles include a detecting element, a location determining element and an interdiction element. The detecting element detects an unmanned aerial vehicle in flight in the region of, or approaching, a property, place, event or very important person. The location determining element determines the exact location of the unmanned aerial vehicle. The interdiction element can either direct the unmanned aerial vehicle away from the property, place, event or very important person in a non-destructive manner, or can cause disable the unmanned aerial vehicle in a destructive manner.

Systems and methods for detecting, tracking and identifying small unmanned systems such as drones

In an example, a network is described with a plurality of data sources. Each data source may provide a feature, such as a data type that the data source collects or generates. A data aggregator may be connected to the network, and configured to collect, classify, and merge features as appropriate. The data aggregator includes a discriminator for classifying features, a merger, unmerger, converter, and evaluator. Features are provided to one or more expert systems configured to control one or more systems based on the features. Feedback to the data aggregator is used to evaluate the success of a merge. When a merge is found to be unhelpful, features may be unmerged.

Dynamic feature set management

The present invention relates to a method suitable for, within a platform, merging data from different sensors of different platforms, comprising the steps of: generating a first information entity; receiving a second information entity; processing the first and second information entities. The invention is characterized by the steps of analysing said processed first and second information entities; and performing an action event in response to the analysis.

Norberg Pär

Papers

Method and arrangement for data fusion