Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Pediatrics HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Pediatrics journal 

The Implementation of Diagnostic Stewardship for Blood Cultures in Critically Ill Children-Reply.

Introduction: Meaningful engagement in quality improvement (QI) projects by trainees is often challenging. A fellow-led QI project aimed to improve adherence to a blood culture clinical decision algorithm and reduce unnecessary cultures in pediatric oncology inpatients. Methods: We visualized preintervention rates of blood cultures drawn on pediatric oncology inpatients using a control chart. Following the introduction of the algorithm to our division, an Ishikawa fishbone diagram of cause-and-effect identified two areas for improvement: prescriber education on the algorithm and targeted feedback on its use. We developed two interventions to support algorithm awareness and use: (1) bundled educational interventions and (2) targeted chart review and feedback. Fellows reviewed >750 blood culture episodes and adjudicated each as “adherent” or “nonadherent” to the algorithm. In addition, fellows provided direct feedback to prescribers regarding nonadherent episodes and discussed strategies for algorithm adherence. Results: Blood culture rates in preintervention, intervention, and follow-up periods were 33.35, 25.24, and 22.67 cultures/100 patient-days, respectively. The proportion of nonadherent culture episodes decreased from 47.14% to 11.11%. The use of the algorithm did not prolong the time to cultures drawn on patients with new fever. Seventy-five percent of fellows provided feedback to inpatient teams on algorithm use. Following this project, trainees reported feeling more qualified to apply QI principles to patient care. Conclusions: Implementation of a clinical decision algorithm reduced the rate of cultures drawn on pediatric oncology inpatients. Fellow-led education of the care team decreased the proportion of nonadherent culture episodes and provided active engagement in QI.

Trainee-led Engagement of the Care Team Improves Application of an Institutional Blood Culture Clinical Decision Algorithm to Pediatric Oncology Inpatients: A Single-institution Quality Improvement Project

P. DiDomizio

Papers

Trainee-led Engagement of the Care Team Improves Application of an Institutional Blood Culture Clinical Decision Algorithm to Pediatric Oncology Inpatients: A Single-institution Quality Improvement Project

Palliative Care Needs Assessment for Pediatric Complex Care Providers.