In renal transplanted patients, lymphoceles and lymphorrhea are well-known lymphatic complications. Surgical damage of the lymphatics of the graft during the procurement and of the lymphatic around the iliac vessels of the recipients has been associated with development of lymphatic complications. However, lymphatic complications may be related to medical factors such as diabetes, obesity, blood coagulation abnormalities, anticoagulation prophylaxis, high dose of diuretics, delay in graft function and immunosuppressive drugs. Consistently, immunosuppression regimens based on the use of mTOR inhibitors, especially in association with steroids and immediately after transplantation, has been associated with a high risk to develop lymphocele or lymphorrhea. In addition, several studies have demonstrated the association between rejection episodes and lymphatic complications. However, before the discovery of reliable markers of lymphatic vessels, the pathogenic mechanisms underlining the development of lymphatic complications during rejection and the influence of mTOR inhibitors remained not fully understood. The recent findings on the lymphatic systems of either native or transplanted kidneys together with the advances achieved on lymphangiogenesis shared some lights on the pathogenesis of lymphatic complications after renal transplantation. In this review, we describe the surgical and medical causes of lymphatic complications focusing on the rejection and immunosuppressive drugs as causes of lymphatic complications.

/pdf/lymphatic-disorders-after-renal-transplantation-new-insights-2o16afuxjk.pdf

Lymphatic disorders after renal transplantation: new insights for an old complication.

Kidney transplantation can be associated with various complications that vary from vascular complications to urologic disorders to immunologic adverse effects. In evaluating the recipient with graft dysfunction, clinicians can choose among several imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, nuclear medicine studies, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. This review discusses the evaluation of the kidney transplant recipient using these imaging procedures, emphasizing the clinical diagnostic utility and role of each modality. A kidney biopsy is often required as a gold standard for diagnostic purposes. However, because of the inherent risks of a kidney biopsy, noninvasive imaging in diagnosing causes of graft dysfunction is a highly desired tool used and needed by the transplant community. Because the diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the time course and nature of the transplant-related complication, this review also addresses the advantages and limitations of each modality. The recent advances in kidney transplant imaging techniques and their clinical implications are also discussed.

Renal Relevant Radiology: Imaging in Kidney Transplantation

Lymphocele is a common surgical complication after renal transplantation. The incidence of lymphocele ranges from 0.6% to 18%. The aim of this study was to determine incidence, risk factors and prognosis of complicated lymphocele in the era of modern immunosuppression. We retrospectively reviewed 311 renal transplants from January 2003 to September 2008, we excluding patients who received sirolimus or underwent multiorgan transplantations. A complicated lymphocele was defined by the requirement for a surgical procedure for cure. Of the 311 transplant recipients, we included 269 in the study with 49 (18.9%) presenting a complicated lymphocele after transplantation. Cold ischemia time, waiting time on dialysis, gender, donor source, induction therapy (thymoglobulin vs basiliximab), and dialysis modality were similar between the 2 groups. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) doses were higher among the lymphocele than the nonlymphocele group (2.7 ± 0.54 g/d vs 2.36 ± 0.68 g/d; P < .05). However, the areas under the concentration-time curves of mycophenolic acid were not significantly different between the 2 groups (43.7 ± 15.3 h·mg/L vs 48 ± 21 h·mg/L; P = .33). However, a multivariate analysis showed complicated lymphocele to be associated with greater MMF doses (odds ratio [OR] 2.75; P < .01), warm ischemia time (OR 1.035; P < .05), and recipient age (OR 1.04; P < .05). In conclusion, we identified high MMF doses as an independent risk factor for lymphocele formation after renal transplantation.

Complicated lymphoceles after kidney transplantation.

Prevention and management of lymphocele formation following kidney transplantation.

After 50 years, the incidence of lymphocele and lymph- orrhea associated with renal transplantation remains substantially high in spite of more accurate surgical technique, reduction of other complications and im- provement of general outcomes. The data from the lit- erature point to the allograft as the source of increased lymph production, which in spite of an accurate hilar lymphatics ligature, can find a transcapsular outlet. Subclinical and clinical graft rejection and inflamma- tion greatly enhance lymph production and leakage. This mechanism may partially mediate the effects of some immunosuppressive drugs on the incidence of lymphocele.

Lymphocele after renal transplantation, a medical complication.

Lymphocele formation is a common complication after kidney transplantation, and laparoscopic surgery has become a widely accepted treatment option. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the risk factors of lymphocele development and to assess the treatment outcome after laparoscopic fenestration. We analyzed 426 renal allograft recipients operated between 2002 and 2006 receiving triple immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors. The incidence of lymphocele was 9.9%, while 24 (5.6%) patients with symptomatic lymphoceles required laparoscopic surgery. Serum creatinine at diagnosis was significantly higher in patients with lymphoceles treated surgically (3.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.6 mg/dL; p < 0.001). After successful laparoscopic intervention, creatinine concentrations recovered until discharge and were comparable to other patients (1.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL; p = NS). While we observed a significant association of lymphocele formation with diabetes, tacrolimus therapy, and acute rejection in univariate testing, only diabetes remained a significant factor after multivariate analysis. Laparoscopic fenestration proved to be a safe and efficient method without any associated mortality and a low recurrence rate of 8.3% (n = 2). We conclude that diabetes is an independent risk factor for lymphocele development, and laparoscopic fenestration should be the treatment of choice for larger and symptomatic lymphoceles, as it is safe and offers a low recurrence rate.

Panos Fikatas

Papers

Symptomatic lymphoceles after kidney transplantation – multivariate analysis of risk factors and outcome after laparoscopic fenestration