Orogenic gold: Common or evolving fluid and metal sources through time

Late Cryogenian-Ediacaran history of the Arabian-Nubian Shield: A review of depositional, plutonic, structural, and tectonic events in the closing stages of the northern East African Orogen

Phanerozoic continental growth and gold metallogeny of Asia

This paper presents evidence and arguments that carbonaceous sedimentary rocks were a source for Au and As in sediment-hosted orogenic and Carlin-type gold deposits and develops a corresponding genetic model. In this two-stage basin-scale model, gold and arsenic are introduced early into black shale and turbidite basins during sedimentation and diagenesis (stage 1) and concentrated to ore grades by later hydrothermal, structural, or magmatic processes (stage 2). In reduced continental margin basin settings, organic matter, sedimented under anoxic to euxinic conditions, immobilizes and concentrates gold, arsenic, and a range of trace elements (particularly V, Ni, Se, Ag, Zn, Mo, Cu, U) present in marine bottom waters, into fine-grained black mudstone and siltstone of slope and basin facies. During early diagenesis, gold and certain other trace elements (Ni, Se, Te, Ag, Mo, Cu, ±PGE) are preferentially partitioned into arsenian pyrite that grows in the muds. These processes produce regionally extensive black shale and turbidite sequences enriched in syngenetic gold and arsenic, commonly from 5 to 100 ppb Au and 10 to 200 ppm As. Rare organic- and sulfide-rich metalliferous black shales may contain up to 1 to 2 ppm Au and over 1,000 ppm As, present as refractory gold in arsenian pyrite and nanoparticles of free gold. During late diagenesis and early metamorphism (stage 2) the diagenetic arsenian pyrite is recrystallized to form coarser grained pyrite generations, and the organic matter is cooked to bitumen. Under higher grade metamorphism (lower greenschist facies and above) arsenian pyrite in carbonaceous shales is converted to pyrrhotite. These processes release gold, arsenic, sulfur and other elements (Sb, Te, Cu, Zn, Mo, Bi, Tl, and Pb) from the source rocks to become concentrated by hydrothermal processes, locally to produce gold ores, in structural sites such as fold hinge zones, shear or breccia zones within or above the black shale sequence. LA-ICP-MS analyses of diagenetic pyrite in carbonaceous sediments, both associated and not associated with gold deposits, suggests that invisible gold contents of greater than 250 ppb in diagenetic pyrite, are indicative of carbonaceous shale source rocks with the potential to produce economic gold deposits. Application of this sedimentary source-rock model enables a systematic exploration approach for sediment-hosted gold deposits, based on the distribution, composition and structure of carbonaceous shale sequences and their contained diagenetic pyrite.

/pdf/a-carbonaceous-sedimentary-source-rock-model-for-carlin-type-10y55xd3qh.pdf

A Carbonaceous Sedimentary Source-Rock Model for Carlin-Type and Orogenic Gold Deposits

The ca. 126–120 Ma Au deposits of the Jiaodong Peninsula, eastern China, define the country's largest gold province with an overall endowment estimated as >3000 t Au. The vein and disseminated ores are hosted by NE- to NNE-trending brittle normal faults that parallel the margins of ca. 165–150 Ma, deeply emplaced, lower crustal melt granites. The deposits are sited along the faults for many tens of kilometers and the larger orebodies are associated with dilatational jogs. Country rocks to the granites are Precambrian high-grade metamorphic rocks located on both sides of a Triassic suture between the North and South China blocks. During early Mesozoic convergent deformation, the ore-hosting structures developed as ductile thrust faults that were subsequently reactivated during Early Cretaceous “Yanshanian” intracontinental extensional deformation and associated gold formation. Classification of the gold deposits remains problematic. Many features resemble those typical of orogenic Au including the linear structural distribution of the deposits, mineralization style, ore and alteration assemblages, and ore fluid chemistry. However, Phanerozoic orogenic Au deposits are formed by prograde metamorphism of accreted oceanic rocks in Cordilleran-style orogens. The Jiaodong deposits, in contrast, formed within two Precambrian blocks approximately 2 billion years after devolatilization of the country rocks, and thus require a model that involves alternative fluid and metal sources for the ores. A widespread suite of ca. 130–123 Ma granodiorites overlaps temporally with the ores, but shows a poor spatial association with the deposits. Furthermore, the deposit distribution and mineralization style is atypical of ores formed from nearby magmas. The ore concentration requires fluid focusing during some type of sub-crustal thermal event, which could be broadly related to a combination of coeval lithospheric thinning, asthenospheric upwelling, paleo-Pacific plate subduction, and seismicity along the continental-scale Tan-Lu fault. Possible ore genesis scenarios include those where ore fluids were produced directly by the metamorphism of oceanic lithosphere and overlying sediment on the subducting paleo-Pacific slab, or by devolatilization of an enriched mantle wedge above the slab. Both the sulfur and gold could be sourced from either the oceanic sediments or the serpentinized mantle. A better understanding of the architecture of the paleo-Pacific slab during Early Cretaceous below the eastern margin of China is essential to determination of the validity of possible models.

The dilemma of the Jiaodong gold deposits: Are they unique?

Epigenetic gold deposits in metamorphic terranes include those of the Precambrian shields (approx 23,000–25,000 t Au), particularly the Late Archean greenstone belts and Paleoproterozoic fold belts, and of the late Neoproterozoic and younger Cordilleran-style orogens (approx 22,000 t lode and 15,500 t placer Au), mainly along the margins of Gondwana, Laurentia, and the more recent circum-Pacific. Ore formation was concentrated during the time intervals of 2.8 to 2.55 Ga, 2.1 to 1.8 Ga, and 600 to 50 Ma. Prior to the last 25 years, ores were defined by grades of 5 to 10 g/t Au in underground mines; present-day economics, open-pit
mining, and improved mineral processing procedures allow recovery of ores of ≤1 g/t Au, which has commonly
led to the recent reworking of lower grade zones in many historic orebodies. Most of these deposits formed
synchronously with late stages of orogeny and are best classified as orogenic gold deposits, which may be subdivided into epizonal, mesozonal, and hypozonal subtypes based on pressure-temperature conditions of ore formation.
A second type of deposit, termed intrusion-related gold deposits, developed landward of Phanerozoic accreted terranes in the Paleozoic of eastern Australia and the Mesozoic of the northern North American Cordillera. These have an overall global distribution that is still equivocal and are characterized by an intimate genetic association with relatively reduced granitoids. The majority of gold deposits in metamorphic terranes are located adjacent to first-order, deep-crustal fault zones, which show complex structural histories and may extend along strike for hundreds of kilometers with widths of as much as a few thousand meters. Fluid migration along such zones was driven by episodes of major pressure fluctuations during seismic events. Ores formed as vein fill of second- and third-order shears and faults, particularly at jogs or changes in strike along the crustal fault zones. Mineralization styles vary from stockworks and breccias in shallow, brittle regimes, through laminated crack-seal veins and sigmoidal vein arrays in brittle-ductile crustal regions, to replacement- and disseminated-type orebodies in deeper, ductile environments (i.e., a continuum model). Most orogenic gold deposits occur in greenschist facies rocks, but significant orebodies can be present in lower and higher grade rocks. Deposits typically formed on retrograde portions of pressure-temperature-time paths and thus are discordant to metamorphic features within host
rocks. Spatial association between gold ores and granitoids of all compositions reflects a locally favorable structural
trap, except in the case of the intrusion-related gold deposits where there is a clearer genetic association.
World-class orebodies are generally 2 to 10 km long, about 1 km wide, and are mined downdip to depths of 2 to 3 km. Most orogenic gold deposits contain 2 to 5 percent sulfide minerals and have gold/silver ratios from 5 to 10 and gold fineness >900. Arsenopyrite and pyrite are the dominant sulfide minerals, whereas pyrrhotite is more important in higher temperature ores and base metals are not highly anomalous. Tungsten-, Bi-, and Te-bearing mineral phases can be common and are dominant in the relatively sulfide poor intrusion-related gold deposits. Alteration intensity, width, and assemblage vary with the host rock, but carbonates, sulfides,muscovite, chlorite, K-feldspar, biotite, tourmaline, and albite are generally present, except in high-temperature systems where alteration halos are dominated by skarnlike assemblages. The vein-forming fluids for gold deposits in metamorphic environments are uniquely CO2 and 18O rich, with low to moderate salinities. Phanerozoic and Paleoproterozic ores show a mode of formation temperatures at 250° to 350°C, whereas Late Archean deposits cluster at about 325° to 400°C. However, there are also many important lower and higher temperature deposits deposited throughout the continuum of depths that range between 2 and 20 km. Ore fluids were, in most cases, near-neutral pH, slightly reduced, and dominated by sulfide
complexes. Globally consistent ore-fluid δ18O values of 6 to 13 per mil and δD values of –80 to –20 per mil
generally rule out a significant meteoric water component in the gold-bearing hydrothermal systems. Sulfur
isotope measurements on ore-related sulfide minerals are concentrated between 0 and 10 per mil, but with many higher and much lower exceptions, indicating variable sulfur sources and an unlikely dominant role for mantle sulfur. Drastic pressure fluctuations with associated fluid unmixing and/o rdesulfidation during water/rock interaction are the two most commonly called-upon ore precipitation mechanisms. The specific model(s) for gold ore genesis remains controversial. Although the direct syngenetic models of the 1970s are no longer applicable, the gold itself may be initially added into the volcanic and sedimentary crustal rock sequences, probably within marine pyrite, during sea-floor hydrothermal events. Gold transport
and concentration are most commonly suggested to be associated with metamorphic processes, as indicated by
the volatile composition of the hydrothermal fluids, the progressive decrease in concentration of elements enriched
in the gold deposits with increasing metamorphic grade of the country rocks, and the common association of ores with medium-grade metamorphic environments. Gold deposits of typically relatively low grade, which formed directly from fluid exsolution during granitoid emplacement within metamorphic rocks, are now also clearly recognized (i.e., intrusion-related gold deposits), but there are limited definitive data to implicate such an exsolved fluid source for most gold deposits within orogenic provinces. The fact that orogenic gold deposits are associated with all types of igneous rocks is a problem to a pure magmatic model. Hybrid models, where slab-derived fluids may generate rising melts that drive devolatilization reactions in the lower crust, are also feasible. Although involvement of a direct mantle fluid presents geochemical difficulties, the presence of lamprophyres and deep-crustal faults in many districts suggests potential mantle influence in the overall, largescale tectonic event controlling the hydrothermal flow system.

Patrice Gosselin

Papers

Distribution, character and genesis of gold deposits in metamorphic terranes