scispace - formally typeset
P

Patricia A. H. Williams

Researcher at Flinders University

Publications -  106
Citations -  1009

Patricia A. H. Williams is an academic researcher from Flinders University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Information security & Information security management. The author has an hindex of 12, co-authored 106 publications receiving 824 citations. Previous affiliations of Patricia A. H. Williams include University of Western Australia & Edith Cowan University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cybersecurity vulnerabilities in medical devices: A complex environment and multifaceted problem

TL;DR: A review of the factors that contribute to such a potentially insecure environment, together with the identification of the vulnerabilities, is important for understanding why these vulnerabilities persist and what the solution space should look like.
Journal ArticleDOI

In a 'trusting' environment, everyone is responsible for information security

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed that all staff assumes responsibility for information security, particularly as part of an information security governance framework, is one practical solution to the problem of insider threats.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Always connected: The security challenges of the healthcare Internet of Things

TL;DR: This paper reviews the new environment using HIoT, to identify the challenges for security and the impact of this on interoperability in the healthcare setting and highlights existing security threats as well as creating new vulnerabilities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health literacy, digital health literacy and the implementation of digital health technologies in cancer care: the need for a strategic approach

TL;DR: Implementing digital health in cancer care must address variability of digital health literacy in recipients, including groups living with disadvantage and older and younger people, in order to be effective.

Big data in healthcare: What is it used for?

TL;DR: This study used a systemic review methodology to create a categorisation of big data use in healthcare and indicates that the natural classification is not clinical application based, rather it falls into four broad categories: administration and delivery, clinical decision support, consumer behaviour, and support services.