This study broadly examines factors impacting work-life experiences of library faculty of color within the framework of tenure policies and processes. An online survey was sent out to academic librarians of color to gauge perceptions of tenure and promotion policies and processes, professional activities and productivity, organizational climate and culture, and job satisfaction and retention. Results of the survey showed mixed findings regarding the impact of race on the tenure and promotion process. Findings can be used to inform future discussions of recruitment and retention for academic librarians of color and to improve the overall tenure experience.

/pdf/tenure-and-promotion-experiences-of-academic-librarians-of-1ty2x8uvs8.pdf

Tenure and Promotion Experiences of Academic Librarians of Color.

Tenure status for library faculty in the academic environment is coming under increasing attack from administration, faculty members in other departments, and non-academics. This is due to incorrect perceptions about what academic librarians do and how they serve their profession. This paper describes the many challenges faculty librarians face in balancing their work load with service and scholarship; justifies why academic librarians need tenure; and ultimately proves that tenure and faculty status for academic librarians are an absolute necessity.

/pdf/seeking-full-citizenship-a-defense-of-tenure-faculty-status-4t65bzf0h1.pdf

Seeking Full Citizenship: A Defense of Tenure Faculty Status for Librarians

Librarians and archivists are intimately involved in scholarly communication systems, both as information providers and instructors. However, very little is known regarding their activities as scholars. This study seeks to examine the scholarly communication practices of librarians and archivists, the role that tenure plays in scholarly communication practices, and the degree to which institutional support is provided in librarians’ efforts to consume and disseminate research and reports of best practices. A questionnaire was sent to professional librarians and archivists at 91 ARL institutions. The responses demonstrate that ARL librarians and archivists are avid consumers and creators of scholarship, and they use emerging technologies to stay up-to-date on the profession’s latest research.

/pdf/beyond-gatekeepers-of-knowledge-scholarly-communication-2az2h01h6t.pdf

Beyond Gatekeepers of Knowledge: Scholarly Communication Practices of Academic Librarians and Archivists at ARL Institutions

As academic librarians with faculty status increasingly embrace research engagement as a core value and requirement, one of the little-studied questions is the extent to which they possess the requisite knowledge and skills to conduct high-quality research and scholarship and what further learning needs they might have within the organizational setting. This paper summarizes an institutional case study of the research knowledge of academic librarians employed at the University of Saskatchewan, encompassing their current research interests, experiences, competencies, environmental context, and learning needs. The goal was to develop a framework for additional educational activities and institutional supports that would enhance their knowledge and skills.

/pdf/assessment-of-the-research-learning-needs-of-university-of-p2gbexx16g.pdf

Assessment of the Research Learning Needs of University of Saskatchewan Librarians: A Case Study

Academic reference services face great challenges as they cope with the pace of technological change, competition from other information service providers, and tight budgets. In fact, some critics suggest that reference services are no longer relevant or necessary as more information moves online. This study examines a nationwide survey that reveals that reference librarians are indeed engaged in a wide variety of activities requiring a range of competencies and skills. Results of this study suggest that reference services are not dying but are evolving, with most academic reference librarians engaged in multifunction positions involving both traditional and nontraditional reference activities.

The Reality of Reference: Responsibilities and Competencies for Current Reference Librarians

Introduction I. Appointment II. Promotion in academic rank III. Tenure (Continuous Appointment) IV. Termination of appointments V. Grievance VI. Dismissal procedures VII. Action by the institutional governing board VIII. Procedures for imposition of sanctions other than dismissal IX. Terminal salary or notice X. Academic freedom and protection against discrimination XI. Complaints of violation of academic freedom or of discrimination in nonreappointment XII. Administrative personnel Notes

Patricia M. Duck

Papers

"A Guideline for the Appointment, Promotion, and Tenure of Academic Librarians"