scispace - formally typeset
P

Patricia Stanton

Researcher at University of Newcastle

Publications -  31
Citations -  858

Patricia Stanton is an academic researcher from University of Newcastle. The author has contributed to research in topics: Mark-to-market accounting & Audit. The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 31 publications receiving 818 citations. Previous affiliations of Patricia Stanton include Northumbria University & Newcastle University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Corporate annual reports: research perspectives used

TL;DR: This paper examined how researchers view annual reports and how the different ways of seeing the annual report relate to each other, and drew out the gaps in this diverse research in a continuing attempt to understand its role and purpose.
Journal ArticleDOI

Impressions of an annual report: an experimental study

TL;DR: In this paper, an experiment was conducted to examine whether readers' perceptions of a company's performance differed depending on their assigned reading, and no significant differences were found among different groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determinants of Environmental Disclosure in Thai Corporate Annual Reports

TL;DR: In this article, the extent and content of environmental information disclosure provided in the annual reports of companies listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), and tested whether there were any relationships between the amount of environmental disclosure and a number of company characteristics used in previous studies conducted in more developed countries.
Journal ArticleDOI

The questionable economics of governmental accounting

TL;DR: This paper argued that the use of the economic concept of value is inadequate and unreliable, and that applying the government accounting standard will result in information which reflects neither the financial nor the economic position of the reporting entity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Governmental accounting for heritage assets: economic, social implications

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the accounting approach fails to measure either the service value or economic benefits of governmental heritage assets and that the information generated is inconsistent with the economic rationale and the valuation process may prejudice any assessment of the performance of entities responsible for these assets.