P
Patrick G. T. Healey
Researcher at Queen Mary University of London
Publications - 132
Citations - 2498
Patrick G. T. Healey is an academic researcher from Queen Mary University of London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Conversation & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 24, co-authored 124 publications receiving 2191 citations. Previous affiliations of Patrick G. T. Healey include University of Nottingham & University of London.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces?:
Vicki Bruce,A M Burton,Ehab Y. Hanna,Patrick G. T. Healey,O Mason,Anne M. Coombes,R Fright,Alfred D. Linney +7 more
TL;DR: It appears that the ability to make this most basic of facial categorisations may be multiply determined by a combination of 2-D, 3- D, and textural cues and their interrelationships.
Journal ArticleDOI
The importance of ‘mass’ in line drawings of faces
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that subjects can identify famous faces depicted in computer-drawn "cartoons" almost as well as full grey-scale images, and that the addition of the threshold component adds significantly to the identifiability of line drawings of faces.
Journal ArticleDOI
Is Nonverbal Communication Disrupted in Interactions Involving Patients With Schizophrenia
TL;DR: Patients’ symptoms are associated with the nonverbal behavior of patients and their partners, and patients’ increased negative symptoms and gesture use is associated with poorer interpersonal rapport.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
On the means for clarification in dialogue
TL;DR: The results of corpus analysis are presented which show a correlation between certain forms and possible readings, together with some indication of maximum likely distance between request and the utterance being clarified.
Journal ArticleDOI
Recognising facial surfaces.
TL;DR: The extent to which faces depicted as surfaces devoid of pigmentation and with minimal texture cues (‘head models’) could be matched with photographs (when unfamiliar) and identified and identified (when familiar) was examined in three experiments.