scispace - formally typeset
P

Paul Bushkovitch

Researcher at University of Connecticut

Publications -  47
Citations -  411

Paul Bushkovitch is an academic researcher from University of Connecticut. The author has contributed to research in topics: Power (social and political) & Russian culture. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 45 publications receiving 402 citations. Previous affiliations of Paul Bushkovitch include Yale University.

Papers
More filters
MonographDOI

Peter the Great : the struggle for power, 1671-1725

TL;DR: The authors show how Peter the Great was not the all-powerful tsar working alone to reform Russia, but that he colluded with powerful and contentious aristocrats in order to achieve his goals.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Epiphany Ceremony of the Russian Court in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries

TL;DR: The 4th of January, the Emperour [Ivan Groznyi] with his sonne and all his nobles, all most richly apparelled with gold, pearls, precious stones and costly furres, with a crown upon his head of Tartarian fashion, went to the Church in procession with the Metropolitan [Makarii], and divers bishops and priests as discussed by the authors.
Book

A Concise History of Russia

TL;DR: In this article, a broad overview of Russian history since the ninth century is presented, focusing on the changes in Russian history following the end of the Soviet Union in 1991 and its subsequent collapse.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Merchants of Moscow, 1580-1650.

Abstract: This is a controversial study of Russian economic history before the reforms of Peter the Great. Professor Bushkovitch describes the trade of the Moscow merchants with Western Europe (principally England and Holland). Eastern Europe and the Near East, as well as their activities in industry and in government service. Using evidence from Moscow archives, he challenges the conventional view that Russia's economic development lagged in this period because of the government's absolute control over and debiliatation of the merchant class. He concludes instead that this was an era of great prosperity and economic expansion for Russia, largely as a result of financial decisions made by a stable, prosperous and essentially autonomous merchant class. The book will be of interest to historians of this period, to students of Russia before Peter the Great and to economic historians generally.