To provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012”. A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development. The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable. The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions. Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs00134-017-4683-6.pdf

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

https://www.chpso.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/chest-2008-geerts-381s-453s.pdf

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism* American College of Chest Physicians Evidence- Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

Objective:To provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012.”Design:A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.

Background: Understanding the causes of failure and the types of revision total hip arthroplasty performed is essential for guiding research, implant design, clinical decision-making, and health-care policy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the mechanisms of failure and the types of revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States with use of newly implemented ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnosis and procedure codes related specifically to revision total hip arthroplasty in a large, nationally representative population.

Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to analyze clinical, demographic, and economic data from 51,345 revision total hip arthroplasty procedures performed between October 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006. The prevalence of revision procedures was calculated for population subgroups in the United States that were stratified according to age, sex, diagnosis, census region, primary payer class, and type of hospital. The cause of failure, the average length of stay, and total charges were also determined for each type of revision arthroplasty procedure.

Results: The most common type of revision total hip arthroplasty procedure performed was all-component revision (41.1%), and the most common causes of revision were instability/dislocation (22.5%), mechanical loosening (19.7%), and infection (14.8%). Revision total hip arthroplasty procedures were most commonly performed in large, urban, nonteaching hospitals for Medicare patients seventy-five to eighty-four years of age. The average length of hospital stay for all types of revision arthroplasties was 6.2 days, and the average total charges were $54,553. However, the average length of stay, average charges, and procedure frequencies varied considerably according to census region, hospital type, and type of revision total hip arthroplasty procedure performed.

Conclusions: Hip instability and mechanical loosening are the most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. As further experience is gained with the new diagnosis and procedure codes specifically related to revision total hip arthroplasty, this information will be valuable in directing future research, implant design, and clinical decision-making.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States.

Prevention of infective endocarditis

The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience.

The senior one of us performed 438 primary and 181 revision total hip arthroplasties with use of so-called modern prostheses between July 1983 and January 1994. Fifty-three patients, who had had forty-seven primary procedures and twelve revisions, either died or were lost to follow-up less than two years after the operation and were excluded from the study. The results for the remaining 446 patients (391 primary procedures and 169 revisions) were analyzed to determine the influence of patient-related and operative factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation. Dislocation occurred after thirty-two (6 per cent) of the 560 total hip arthroplasties: seventeen (4 per cent) of the 391 primary procedures and fifteen (9 per cent) of the 169 revisions (p = 0.046). There was no relationship between the variables of age, gender, obesity, or preoperative diagnosis and dislocation after either primary or revision arthroplasty. Seven (23 per cent) of the thirty arthroplasties in the patients who had a history of excessive intake of alcoholic beverages (more than 2.1 liters [seventy-two ounces] of beer or more than 0.2 liter [six ounces] of other alcoholic beverages a day) were followed by a dislocation compared with twenty-five (5 per cent) of the 530 arthroplasties in the patients who did not have such a history. This difference was significant for the patients who had had a revision arthroplasty (p = 0.00005), but with the numbers available we could not detect a difference for those who had had a primary arthroplasty (p = 0.264). Radiographic analysis was performed for thirty-two hips that had dislocated and thirty-two that had not (seventeen primary procedures and fifteen revisions in each group), matched exactly according to the type of prosthesis and the operative approach (but not age). We detected no association between either the version or the abduction angle of the acetabular component (within the range of 39 to 56 degrees for the primary prostheses and 38 to 57 degrees for the revision prostheses) and the risk of dislocation. Thirty of the thirty-two hips in each group had an abduction angle of the acetabular component that was in the so-called safe range of 30 to 50 degrees.

The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement.

Two clinical studies, one prospective randomized and one retrospective, were performed to evaluate the relationship of femoral head size and acetabular component outer diameter to the prevalence of dislocation of the modular total hip replacement. Between October 1995 and April 1996, 31 primary total hip arthroplasties in 30 patients were randomized to a femoral head diameter of 22 mm or 28 mm, for two groups of acetabular components of outer diameters of 56 mm or larger and 54 mm or smaller. Head size (22 mm) and acetabular component outer diameter (≥ 56 mm) were found to increase the risk of dislocation. From December 1984 to January 1994, 308 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed through a posterior approach by one surgeon using a modular 28 mm femoral head and one type of uncemented acetabular component. The rate of dislocation for acetabular components with an outer diameter of 62 mm or larger was increased significantly (five of 36 hips, 14%) compared with those with an outer diameter of 60 mm or smaller (1 1 of 272 hips, 4%).

Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation.

Forty-three displaced tibial plateau fractures were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. The fractures were classified into four groups, and the clinical results were evaluated using a standard 100-point knee rating system. The average follow-up period after surgery was 2.7 years. Overall there were 35 excellent, five good, three fair, and no poor results. In five of eight knees with a less than excellent score, the results were due to the technique of fracture fixation or the absence of a bone graft. There were ten postoperative complications, but only one ultimately affected the clinical result. Fourteen patients required removal of implants. Roentgenographic analysis showed that six knees had mild degenerative changes, two had moderate, and two had severe degenerative changes. There was no statistically significant association between the fracture type and a less than excellent result. The absence of bone grafting, however, was associated with a less than excellent result. Bicondylar fractures had a mean range of motion of 110 degrees, 18 degrees less than that of all other types of fracture combined.

Factors influencing the results of open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures.

Sixty-four operative procedures were performed on 55 patients with knee arthroplasties for pain, loosening, instability, or suspicion of infection. Forty-three knees had a preoperative aspiration. In 19 knees, the aspiration showed growth on solid media, and in 18 of these knees the diagnosis of infection was confirmed by the intraoperative cultures. In 1 knee with an infected total knee replacement, the patient was receiving an intravenous antibiotic at the time of arthroscopic irrigation and debridement and the cultures showed no growth. In 23 of 24 knees with a negative preoperative aspiration, the intraoperative cultures showed no growth on solid media. In 1 knee with a preoperative aspiration that had negative results, a single intraoperative culture grew Staphylococcus epidermidis. However, the presenting symptoms, examination, preoperative radiographs, and intraoperative evaluation were consistent with aseptic loosening of a cemented total knee arthroplasty. Thus, the preoperative aspiration of the prosthetic knee joint had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 100%. The Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate, peripheral leukocyte count, and presenting symptoms correlated poorly with infection. Radiographs were also not helpful in the diagnosis of infection, with loosening of components, periostitis, focal osteolysis, and radiolucent lines frequently seen in infected and noninfected knees. Preoperative aspiration of the knee is the most helpful study for the diagnosis or exclusion of infection in a prosthetic knee joint.

Paul F. Lachiewicz

Papers

The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience.

The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after total hip replacement.

Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation.

Factors influencing the results of open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures.

Aspiration of the knee joint before revision arthroplasty.