Staphylococcus aureus is a major human pathogen that causes a wide range of clinical infections. It is a leading cause of bacteremia and infective endocarditis as well as osteoarticular, skin and soft tissue, pleuropulmonary, and device-related infections. This review comprehensively covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management of each of these clinical entities. The past 2 decades have witnessed two clear shifts in the epidemiology of S. aureus infections: first, a growing number of health care-associated infections, particularly seen in infective endocarditis and prosthetic device infections, and second, an epidemic of community-associated skin and soft tissue infections driven by strains with certain virulence factors and resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. In reviewing the literature to support management strategies for these clinical manifestations, we also highlight the paucity of high-quality evidence for many key clinical questions.

Staphylococcus aureus Infections: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Management

https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(08)00462-1/pdf

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons

It is important that the medical profession plays a significant role in critically evaluating the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies as they are introduced and tested in the detection, management, or prevention of disease states. Rigorous and expert analysis of the available data documenting absolute and relative benefits and risks of those procedures and therapies can produce helpful guidelines that improve the effectiveness of care, optimize patient outcomes, and favorably affect the overall cost of care by focusing resources on the most effective strategies.

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have jointly engaged in the production of such guidelines in the area of cardiovascular disease since 1980. The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, whose charge is to develop, update, or revise practice guidelines for important cardiovascular diseases and procedures, directs this effort. The Task Force is pleased to have this guideline developed in conjunction with the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Writing committees are charged with the task of performing an assessment of the evidence and acting as an independent group of authors to develop or update written recommendations for clinical practice.

Experts in the subject under consideration have been selected from all 3 organizations to examine subject-specific data and write guidelines. The process includes additional representatives from other medical practitioner and specialty groups when appropriate. Writing committees are specifically charged to perform a formal literature review, weigh the strength of evidence for or against a particular treatment or procedure, and include estimates of expected health outcomes where data exist. Patient-specific modifiers, comorbidities, and issues of patient preference that might influence the choice of particular tests or therapies are considered as well as frequency of follow-up and cost effectiveness. When available, information from studies on cost will be considered; however, review …

/pdf/acc-aha-esc-2006-guidelines-for-management-of-patients-with-5a3f1emfzy.pdf

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities

https://www.urgences-serveur.fr/IMG/pdf/TDRV_ESC.pdf

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death)

Background: Although more than 150,000 implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted yearly worldwide, only few studies systematically examined complications of ICD therapy in large patient cohorts.

Methods: We prospectively analyzed ICD-related complications in 440 consecutive patients who underwent first implantation of an ICD system for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death within the last 10 years at our institution. All study patients received pectoral nonthoracotomy ICD lead systems with the exception of one patient who had an artificial tricuspid valve.

Results: During 46 ± 37 months follow-up, 136 of 440 patients (31%) experienced at least one complication including implant procedure-related complications in 43 patients (10%), ICD generator-related complications in 28 patients (6%), lead-related complications in 52 patients (12%), and inappropriate shocks in 54 patients (12%). The most serious complications included one perioperative death due to heart failure (0.2%), two ICD system infections necessitating device removal (0.5%) and two perioperative cerebrovascular strokes (0.5%).

Conclusions: We conclude that more than one quarter of ICD patients experience complications during a mean follow-up of almost 4 years, although serious complications such as intraoperative death or ICD system infections are rare in patients with nonthoracotomy ICD systems. Recognition of these complications is the prerequisite for advances in ICD technology and management strategies to avoid their recurrence.

Complications of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in 440 consecutive patients.

Epidemiologic as well as clinical studies confirm the close link between diabetes mellitus and heart failure Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is still a poorly understood "entity", however, with several contributing pathogenetic factors which lead in different stages of diabetes to characteristic clinical phenotypes Hyperglycemia with a shift from glucose metabolism to increased beta-oxidation and consecutive free fatty acid damage (lipotoxicity) to the myocardium, insulin resistance, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, altered calcium homeostasis and structural changes from the natural collagen network to a stiffer matrix due to advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) formation, hypertrophy and fibrosis contribute to the respective clinical phenotypes of DCM We propose the following classification of cardiomyopathy in diabetic patients: a) Diastolic heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) in diabetic patients often associated with hypertrophy without relevant hypertension Relevant coronary artery disease (CAD), valvular disease and uncontrolled hypertension are not present This is referred to as stage 1 DCM b) Systolic and diastolic heart failure with dilatation and reduced ejection (HFREF) in diabetic patients excluding relevant CAD, valvular disease and uncontrolled hypertension as stage 2 DCM c) Systolic and/or diastolic heart failure in diabetic patients with small vessel disease (microvascular disease) and/or microbial infection and/or inflammation and/or hypertension but without CAD as stage 3 DCM d) If heart failure may also be attributed to infarction or ischemia and remodeling in addition to stage 3 DCM the term should be heart failure in diabetes or stage 4 DCM These clinical phenotypes of diabetic cardiomyopathy can be separated by biomarkers, non-invasive (echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) and invasive imaging methods (levocardiography, coronary angiography) and further analysed by endomyocardial biopsy for concomitant viral infection The role of specific diabetic drivers to the clinical phenotypes, to macro- and microangiopathy as well as accompanying risk factors or confounders, eg hypertension, autoimmune factors or inflammation with or without viral persistence, need to be identified in each individual patient separately Thus hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance as well as lipotoxicity by free fatty acids (FFAs) are the factors responsible for diabetic cardiomyopathy In stage 1 and 2 DCM diabetic cardiomyopathy is clearly a fact However, precise determination of to what degree the various underlying pathogenetic processes are responsible for the overall heart failure phenotype remains a fiction

Diabetic cardiomyopathy—fact or fiction?

Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation

Cardiac side effects of the cytostatic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have an incidence of 1.2-7.6%. Potentially, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death could occur. Life-threatening cardiotoxicity is rarely observed with a frequency <1%. Cardiotoxicity of 5-FU seems to differ from well known effects of other cytostatics, e.g., anthracyclines. Myocardial ischemia was suggested as potential mechanism due to occasionally observed ECG alterations during 5-FU administration. Experimental studies revealed potential mechanisms of cardiotoxicity ranging from direct toxic effects on vascular endothelium involving endothelial NO synthase leading to coronary spasms and endothelium independent vasoconstriction via protein kinase C. In addition, rheological side effects have to be considered. Coronary artery disease is judged to increase the risk of cardiac side effects. Despite lack of prospective trials, verapamil type calcium antagonists as well as nitrates seem to be useful for treatment of 5-FU induced coronary spasms. In addition, modification of the cytostatic regimen has to be considered in patients who had been symptomatic. It could be assumed that 5-FU toxicity is reversible in the majority of cases when acute complications, e.g., arrhythmias, are resolved.

Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil.

Although echocardiography remains the standard diagnostic tool for identifying pericardial diseases, procedures with better delineation of morphology and heart function are often required. The pericardium consists of an inner visceral (epicardium) and outer parietal layer (pericardium), which constitute for the pericardial cavity. Pericardial effusion can occur as transudate, exudate, pyopneumopericardium, or hemopericardium. Potential causes are inflammatory processes, that is, pericarditis due to autoimmune or infective reasons, neoplasms, irradiation, or systemic disorders, chronic renal failure, endocrine, or metabolic diseases. Pericardial fat can mimic pericardial effusion. Using various image-acquisition sequences, MRI allows identifying and separating fluid and solid structures. Fast spin-echo T1-weighted sequences with black-blood preparation are favourably used for morphological evaluation. Fast spin-echo T2-weighted sequences, particularly with fat saturation, and short-tau inversion-recovery sequences are useful to visualize oedema and inflammation. For further tissue characterization, delayed inversion-recovery imaging is used. Therefore, image acquisition is performed at 5–20 min subsequent to contrast agent administration, the so-called technique of late gadolinium enhancement. Ventricular volumes and myocardial mass can be assessed accurately by steady-state free-precession sequences, which is required to measure cardiac function and ventricular wall stress. Constrictive pericarditis usually results from chronic inflammatory processes leading to increased stiffness, which impedes the slippage of both pericardial layers and thereby the normal cardiac filling. CT imaging can favourably assess pericardial calcification. Thus, MR and CT imaging allow a comprehensive delineation of the pericardium. Superior to echocardiography, both methods provide a larger field of view and depiction of the complete chest including abnormalities of the surrounding mediastinum and lungs. PET provides unique information on the in vivo metabolism of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose that can be superimposed on CT findings and is useful for identifying inflammatory processes or masses, for example neoplasms. These imaging techniques provide advanced information of anatomy and cardiac function to optimize the pericardial access, for example by the AttachLifter system, for diagnosis and treatment.

Peter Alter

Papers

Complications of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in 440 consecutive patients.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy—fact or fiction?

Comparison of geometry-based and CT voxel-based finite element modelling and experimental validation

Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil.

MR, CT, and PET imaging in pericardial disease.