scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Peter Baumgartner published in 2000"


Book ChapterDOI
17 Jun 2000
TL;DR: FDPLL is a directly lifted version of the well-known Davis-Putnam-Logeman-Loveland procedure that uses a lifted splitting rule for case analysis wrt.
Abstract: FDPLL is a directly lifted version of the well-known Davis-Putnam-Logeman-Loveland (DPLL) procedure. While DPLL is based on a splitting rule for case analysis wrt. ground and complementary literals, FDPLL uses a lifted splitting rule, i.e. the case analysis is made wrt. non-ground and complementary literals now.

79 citations


Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: The key idea, which distinguishes this approach from others, is the full interaction between the two parts which makes it possible to maximize (deterministic) simplification rules by passing around newly created unit or binary clauses in either of these parts.
Abstract: Many key verification problems such as boundedmodel-checking, circuit verification and logical cryptanalysis are formalized with combined clausal and affine logic (i.e. clauses with xor as the connective) and cannot be efficiently (if at all) solved by using CNF-only provers. We present a decision procedure to efficiently decide such problems. The Gauss-DPLL procedure is a tight integration in a unifying framework of a Gauss-Elimination procedure (for affine logic) and a Davis-Putnam-Logeman-Loveland procedure (for usual clause logic). The key idea, which distinguishes our approach from others, is the full interaction bewteen the two parts which makes it possible to maximize (deterministic) simplification rules by passing around newly created unit or binary clauses in either of these parts. We show the correcteness and the termination of Gauss-DPLL under very liberal assumptions.

65 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show how techniques from first-order theorem proving can be used for efficient deductive database updates and derive a soundness and completeness result of hyper-tableaux for computing minimal abductive explanations.

20 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: The FDPLL calculus as mentioned in this paper is a directly lifted version of the well-known Davis-Putnam-Logeman-Loveland (DPLL) procedure, where a literal specifies truth values for all its ground instances, unless there is a more specific literal specifying opposite truth values.
Abstract: FDPLL is a directly lifted version of the well-known Davis-Putnam-Logeman-Loveland (DPLL) procedure. While DPLL is based on a splitting rule for case analysis wrt. ground and complementary literals, FDPLL uses a lifted splitting rule, i.e. the case analysis is made wrt. non-ground and complementary literals now. The motivation for this lifting is to bring together successful first-order techniques like unification and subsumption to the propositionally successful DPLL procedure. At the heart of the method is a new technique to represent first-order interpretations, where a literal specifies truth values for all its ground instances, unless there is a more specific literal specifying opposite truth values. Based on this idea, the FDPLL calculus is developed and proven as strongly complete.

13 citations


Book ChapterDOI
17 Jun 2000
TL;DR: A deduction system capable of producing models significantly extends the functionality of purely refutational systems by providing the user with useful information in case that no refutation exists.
Abstract: Computing models of first-order or propositional logic specifications is the complementary problem of refutational theorem proving. A deduction system capable of producing models significantly extends the functionality of purely refutational systems by providing the user with useful information in case that no refutation exists.

6 citations