Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high-diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land-use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local high-intensity management. Organisms with high-dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri-environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00782.x

Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity – ecosystem service management

Understanding the negative and positive effects of agricultural land use for the conservation of biodiversity, and its relation to ecosystem services, needs a landscape perspective. Agriculture can contribute to the conservation of high-diversity systems, which may provide important ecosystem services such as pollination and biological control via complementarity and sampling effects. Land-use management is often focused on few species and local processes, but in dynamic, agricultural landscapes, only a diversity of insurance species may guarantee resilience (the capacity to reorganize after disturbance). Interacting species experience their surrounding landscape at different spatial scales, which influences trophic interactions. Structurally complex landscapes enhance local diversity in agroecosystems, which may compensate for local highintensity management. Organisms with high-dispersal abilities appear to drive these biodiversity patterns and ecosystem services, because of their recolonization ability and larger resources experienced. Agri-environment schemes (incentives for farmers to benefit the environment) need to broaden their perspective and to take the different responses to schemes in simple (high impact) and complex (low impact) agricultural landscapes into account. In simple landscapes, local allocation of habitat is more important than in complex landscapes, which are in total at risk. However, little knowledge of the relative importance of local and landscape management for biodiversity and its relation to ecosystem services make reliable recommendations difficult.

http://biologie.uni-bayreuth.de/toek1_pop/de/pub/pub/60936/EcolLetters2005%2C8_857-874.pdf

REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management

Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation are key drivers of global species loss. Their effects may be understood by focusing on: (1) individual species and the processes threatening them, and (2) human-perceived landscape patterns and their correlation with species and assemblages. Individual species may decline as a result of interacting exogenous and endogenous threats, including habitat loss, habitat degradation, habitat isolation, changes in the biology, behaviour, and interactions of species, as well as additional, stochastic threats. Human-perceived landscape patterns that are frequently correlated with species assemblages include the amount and structure of native vegetation, the prevalence of anthropogenic edges, the degree of landscape connectivity, and the structure and heterogeneity of modified areas. Extinction cascades are particularly likely to occur in landscapes with low native vegetation cover, low landscape connectivity, degraded native vegetation and intensive land use in modified areas, especially if keystone species or entire functional groups of species are lost. This review (1) demonstrates that species-oriented and pattern-oriented approaches to understanding the ecology of modified landscapes are highly complementary, (2) clarifies the links between a wide range of interconnected themes, and (3) provides clear and consistent terminology. Tangible research and management priorities are outlined that are likely to benefit the conservation of native species in modified landscapes around the world.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00287.x

Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis

Does organic farming benefit biodiversity

The question of how to meet rising food demand at the least cost to biodiversity requires the evaluation of two contrasting alternatives: land sharing, which integrates both objectives on the same land; and land sparing, in which high-yield farming is combined with protecting natural habitats from conversion to agriculture. To test these alternatives, we compared crop yields and densities of bird and tree species across gradients of agricultural intensity in southwest Ghana and northern India. More species were negatively affected by agriculture than benefited from it, particularly among species with small global ranges. For both taxa in both countries, land sparing is a more promising strategy for minimizing negative impacts of food production, at both current and anticipated future levels of production.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/333/6047/1289.full.pdf

Reconciling Food Production and Biodiversity Conservation: Land Sharing and Land Sparing Compared

The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England

Recent large declines in house sparrow Passer domesticus L. populations in many European towns and cities have generated much speculation as to possible environmental causes, although empirical insights have been lacking. We measured reproductive success in a declining house sparrow population along an urbanization gradient in Leicester, England, and used mixed models to identify correlates of nesting success. A stochastic simulation approach was developed to estimate annual reproductive success when the number of breeding attempts was unknown, and to assess the sensitivity of reproductive success to variation in different environmental factors. During 2 out of 3 years, reproductive output was lower than the predicted threshold required for population stability. Years of inadequate reproduction were characterized by lower chick survival and body mass at fledging (a predictor of post-fledging survival). Factors associated with reduced reproductive output included low ambient temperatures, extremes of rainfall, high levels of vegetable material in the diet (all affecting chick survival and body mass), low aphid densities (an important component of chick diet) and high concentrations of air pollution from traffic (affecting chick body mass). Reproductive failure linked to inadequate invertebrate availability provides a plausible demographic mechanism accounting for declines in urban–suburban house sparrow populations. Increased traffic volume and vegetation removal are candidate causal factors in these declines although the mechanism underlying the former is unclear. Increasing densities of key invertebrate prey away from major roads should be an objective of conservation management aimed at urban–suburban house sparrows. This study illustrates the utility of mixed models for the analysis of individual sibling survival and of stochastic simulation for modelling reproductive success in multi-brooded animals.

/pdf/reproductive-success-of-house-sparrows-along-an-urban-13ivufcizj.pdf

Reproductive success of house sparrows along an urban gradient

Introduction: birds and agriculture in Britain 1. The history of agriculture in Britain Part I. The Habitats and their Birds: 2. The field 3. The field boundary 4. Semi-natural heathlands and grasslands Part II. Trends and Patterns: 5. Bird population trends 6. Patterns of association between agricultural change and wildlife populations Part III. The Effects of Agricultural Change on Birds: 7. Large-scale studies of abundance, distribution and demograph 8. Species case studies 9. Studies of changing agricultural practice 10. What future for birds and agriculture in Britain?

/pdf/bird-conservation-and-agriculture-13pd5d94nx.pdf

Bird Conservation and Agriculture

There is increasing evidence that changes in habitat structure in the form of reduced understorey and loss of open habitats, both probably a result of increases in shading and deer browsing, may be responsible for causing recent changes in the composition of breeding bird communities in many lowland British woods and forests. In contrast, management of upland coniferous forests may prevent the attainment of mature and old-growth structures which would benefit community development in these new ecosystems. We suggest that the key challenge for woodland conservation policy is to create larger areas of both young-growth and old-growth habitat. These objectives need not necessarily conflict with each other, or with other multipurpose forestry objectives, provided that they inform strategic plans and are targeted at appropriate locations and scales. In the lowlands, the current large stock of middle-aged, often unmanaged and species-poor woodland provides an opportunity to restore or create new woodland habitats of high biodiversity value. The development of woodfuel markets may effectively increase the amount of young-growth but it is unclear exactly what habitat structures might be created. In the uplands, allowing more natural development of native woodland in mosaics with other habitats may provide opportunities for both old- and young-growth species. For the foreseeable future, deer impacts will continue to be widespread and probably increasingly severe in many areas. In view of the uncertainty about the implications of climate change for woodland ecosystems, a strong case can be made for attempting to buffer valued wildlife communities against damaging effects by creating and maintaining high structural diversity at a range of scales and increasing the area of woodland.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00775.x

Philip V. Grice

Papers

Does organic farming benefit biodiversity

The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England

Reproductive success of house sparrows along an urban gradient

Bird Conservation and Agriculture

Habitat change and woodland birds in Britain: implications for management and future research: Habitat change and woodland birds