[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004301.]. 

Disparities in Research during Plastic Surgery Training: How Can We Level the Playing Field?—Erratum

Analysis of Racial and Gender Distribution of US-Doctor of Medicines Graduates Entering Into General Surgery and Surgical Subspecialties' Residencies: The Need for Effective & Sustainable Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategies.

Surgical Fellowships Demonstrate Variable Improvement in Gender Representation Despite Greater Female Enrollment in General Surgery Residencies.

Purpose Despite increasing female representation in integrated plastic surgery training programs, independent programs have lower representation and slow improvement in female enrollment. Self-reported resident data were used to investigate trends of female representation in integrated and independent programs. Methods Data were collected from Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education resources of active residents' characteristics. Self-reported gender data were collected for integrated, independent, and general surgery programs from annual reports since 2009. χ2 analysis was conducted to compare female enrollment of integrated programs, independent programs, general surgery programs, and general surgery programs with matriculation-year adjustment. Results In 2008, 89 independent programs had nearly identical percentage of female enrollment with 30 integrated programs at 23.8% and 23.1%, respectively. Differences in representation between independent and integrated programs became significant in 2012, with independent programs demonstrating 25.1% female enrollment compared with 30.5% in integrated programs. This trend of higher female representation in integrated programs has persisted since 2012. To correct for preexisting disparity in general surgery programs, we compared female enrollment of independent programs with female enrollment of that class' general surgery matriculation-year 5 years earlier. In all examined years, general surgery still had proportionally higher female enrollment compared with independent programs, even with conservative 5-year matriculation adjustment. Conclusions Dramatic differences in female enrollment were found between integrated and independent programs, with representation in integrated programs rising more quickly. Adjustments for previous rates of female enrollment in general surgery did not yield explanation for low independent program enrollment. Increasing female representation in independent training models will continue to create a more diverse workforce. 

Discrepancies in Gender Representation Between Integrated and Independent Plastic Surgery Programs

Barriers in Ophthalmology Residency Applications for Students Identifying as Underrepresented in Medicine: An SF Match Analysis.

Background: Lack of female and ethnically underrepresented in medicine (UIM) surgeons remains concerning in academic plastic surgery. One barrier to inclusion may be unequal opportunity to publish research. This study evaluates the extent of this challenge for plastic surgery trainees and identifies potential solutions. Methods: Data were collected on academic plastic surgeons' research productivity during training. Bivariate analysis compared publication measures between genders and race/ethnicities at different training stages (pre-residency/residency/clinical fellowship). Multivariate analysis determined training experiences independently associated with increased research productivity. Results: Overall, women had fewer total publications than men during training (8.89 versus 12.46, P = 0.0394). Total publications were similar between genders before and during residency (P > 0.05 for both) but lower for women during fellowship (1.32 versus 2.48, P = 0.0042). Women had a similar number of first-author publications during training (3.97 versus 5.24, P = 0.1030) but fewer middle-author publications (4.70 versus 6.81, P = 0.0405). UIM and non-UIM individuals had similar productivity at all training stages and authorship positions (P > 0.05 for all). Research fellowship completion was associated with increased total, first-, and middle-author training publications (P < 0.001 for all). Conclusions: Less research productivity for female plastic surgery trainees may reflect a disparity in opportunity to publish. Fewer middle-author publications could indicate challenges with network-building in a predominately male field. Despite comparable research productivity during training relative to non- UIM individuals, UIM individuals remain underrepresented in academic plastic surgery. Creating research fellowships for targeting underrepresented groups could help overcome these challenges. 

Revathi Sundarasekar

Papers

Disparities in Research during Plastic Surgery Training: How Can We Level the Playing Field?