scispace - formally typeset
R

Richard Ennals

Researcher at University of Agder

Publications -  141
Citations -  1187

Richard Ennals is an academic researcher from University of Agder. The author has contributed to research in topics: Tacit knowledge & Quality circle. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 136 publications receiving 1146 citations. Previous affiliations of Richard Ennals include Norwegian University of Science and Technology & Kingston Business School.

Papers
More filters
Journal Article

Doing Action Research in Your Own Organisation

TL;DR: Coghlan and Brannick as mentioned in this paper define action research as "an approach to research which aims at both taking action and creating knowledge or theory about that action". Action research can involve dealing with emergent processes and leading radical change, which requires a capacity for self-reflection, realistic expectations, self-containment and an ability to learn.
Book

Work Organization and Europe as a Development Coalition

TL;DR: Work Organization has achieved recent prominence in European policy, as new employment guidelines are embodied in the policies of all European Member States as mentioned in this paper, with continuing lessons to be learned from differences.
Book

Learning together for local innovation: promoting learning regions

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine European case studies on regional and local innovation based on the work of a European network project, and show that regional innovation depends on dialogue, networking and learning between all social and economic actors.
Book

Dialogue, skill and tacit knowledge

TL;DR: The authors look at the importance of tacit knowledge, and show how it is now being put in motion through analogical thinking methods such as the Dialogue Seminar, and how it can be put into motion through dialogues.
Book

Hoshin Kanri: The Strategic Approach to Continuous Improvement

TL;DR: The driver policies, becoming fit, fast, lean and hungry! driver measures to KPIs Benchmarking Prioritizing KPIs and cost of poor quality risk management.