scispace - formally typeset
R

Rob Austin McKee

Researcher at University of Houston–Downtown

Publications -  7
Citations -  904

Rob Austin McKee is an academic researcher from University of Houston–Downtown. The author has contributed to research in topics: Personality & Leadership. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 7 publications receiving 751 citations. Previous affiliations of Rob Austin McKee include University of Houston.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory

TL;DR: The development of effective leaders and leadership behavior is a prominent concern in organizations of all types as discussed by the authors, and the theoretical and empirical literature on leader and leadership development published over the past 25 years, primarily focusing on research published in The Leadership Quarterly.
Journal ArticleDOI

Institutionalizing Bayesianism Within the Organizational Sciences: A Practical Guide Featuring Comments From Eminent Scholars

TL;DR: In this article, the authors address a simple yet difficult question: What is the likelihood that Bayesian methodologies eventually will supplement or even supplant traditional frequentist methodologies in the organizational science community?
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of personality and gender on self–other agreement in ratings of leadership

TL;DR: The authors explored the role of leader personality and gender in self-other (dis)agreement (SOA) in ratings of leadership and found gender to be an important factor in SOA; female leaders exhibited greater SOA than did their male counterparts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender Bias Still Plagues the Workplace: Looking at Derailment Risk and Performance With Self–Other Ratings:

TL;DR: For instance, this paper found that implicit biases against women still plague organizations and that overt forms of discrimination against women at work have decreased over time with the passage of formal antidiscrimination laws.
Journal ArticleDOI

Decision comprehensiveness and the outcomes of firms: Reinterpreting and extending a recent meta-analysis:

TL;DR: In this article, the authors express their disagreement with some of the conclusions drawn by Samba et al. in a generally well-conducive setting and conclude that disagreement and debate are the lifeblood of any scientific field.