R
Robert Asen
Researcher at University of Wisconsin-Madison
Publications - 40
Citations - 1380
Robert Asen is an academic researcher from University of Wisconsin-Madison. The author has contributed to research in topics: Public sphere & Rhetoric. The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 37 publications receiving 1249 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert Asen include Northwestern University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Seeking the “Counter” in Counterpublics
TL;DR: This article argued that the ways in which counter-publics set themselves against wider publics may be most productively explored by attending to the recognition and articulation of exclusion through alternative discourse norms and practices.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Discourse Theory of Citizenship
TL;DR: The authors proposed a discourse theory of citizenship as a mode of public engagement and argued that citizenship engagement may be approached through potential foci of generativity, risk, commitment, creativity, and sociability.
Journal ArticleDOI
Imagining in the Public Sphere
Abstract: Contemporary public sphere scholarship has been motivated significantly by a concern to overcome historical and conceptual exclusions in public spheres. Recent theory and criticism has investigated direct and indirect exclusions. Direct exclusions expressly prevent the participation of particular individuals and groups in public discussions and debates. Prohibitions against women speaking in public, for example, have served historically to inhibit women's participation in various forums (see, e.g., Landes 1998). Indirect exclusions function tacitly through discursive norms and practices that prescribe particular ways of interacting in public forums. Indirect exclusions compel participants to conform to established modes of discourse that effectively negate the perspectives and contributions of previously directly excluded individuals and groups. Calls for "objective" and "dispassionate" debate, for instance, sometimes have restricted public agendas by portraying culturally specific forms of address as universally practiced (see, e.g., Warner 1993). Indirect exclusions may regulate discourse in various forums even when direct exclusions have been counteracted. Scholarship seeking to overcome these exclusions has proceeded on two levels. On one level, scholars have recounted the efforts of excluded persons to participate in public life despite restrictions by developing alternative modes of publicity (see, e.g., Ryan 1990; Zaeske 2002). On a second level, theorists have proposed more inclusive conceptual models of the public sphere that may overcome historical exclusions of the bourgeois public sphere while retaining a commitment to critical publicity (see, e.g., Asen 1999; Benhabib 1996; Hauser 1999; Mouffe 2000). Practicing democratic discourse fairly and justly depends indispensably on enabling inclusion. Proponents of deliberative democracy argue that political legitimacy arises from processes of inclusive public debate. Seyla Benhabib asserts that "legitimacy in complex societies must be
Journal ArticleDOI
Neoliberalism, the public sphere, and a public good
TL;DR: The authors considers the challenges that neoliberalism raises for conceptual models and practices of a multiple public sphere, and considers resistance to neoliberalism may arise in the networked locals of a MOP.