scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Robert C. Moellering published in 1990"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Agarose gel electrophoresis of extracts from clinical isolates indicated that this outbreak arose from plasmid transmission among different strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae rather than from dissemination of a single resistant isolate.
Abstract: During a 4-month period in late 1988, we isolated ceftazidime-resistant strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae from 29 patients at a chronic-care facility in Massachusetts. Ceftazidime resistance resulted from two distinct extended-spectrum beta-lactamases of the TEM type which efficiently hydrolyzed the cephalosporin: YOU-1 with a pI of 5.57 and YOU-2 with a pI of 5.2. Genes encoding these enzymes were present on different but closely related high-molecular-weight, multiple antibiotic resistance plasmids of the H12 incompatibility group and were transferable by conjugation in vitro. Agarose gel electrophoresis of extracts from clinical isolates indicated that this outbreak arose from plasmid transmission among different strains of the family Enterobacteriaceae rather than from dissemination of a single resistant isolate. Isolation rates of ceftazidime-resistant organisms transiently decreased after use of this drug was restricted, but resistant isolates continued to be recovered 7 months after empiric use of ceftazidime ceased. Images

394 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Bactericidal synergism with penicillins or vancomycin is not observed with these strains, considerably complicating therapy and isolated aminoglycoside-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecalis are identified.
Abstract: ALTHOUGH enterococci are normal inhabitants of the gastrointestinal and female genital tracts, they are now recognized as formidable pathogens in hospitalized patients.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Many patients become infected with their own strains of enterococci after they are admitted to the hospital,18 but nosocomial transmission occurs as well.19 , 20 Recently, strains of enterococci with high-level resistance (>500 to >2000 μg per milliliter) to gentamicin and other aminoglycosides have been detected in hospitals around the world,8 , 9 , 19 20 21 22 23 reaching epidemic proportions in some institutions. Bactericidal synergism with penicillins or vancomycin is not observed with these strains, considerably complicating therapy. A few isolated aminoglycoside-resistant strains of Enterococcus faecalis . . .

200 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a rat enterococcal endocarditis model comparing TMP-SMX therapy (500 mg of TMP plus 2,500mg of SMX per kg of body weight per day given every 8 h by intragastric gavage) with intravenous ampicillin therapy (1,000 mg/kg per day).
Abstract: To assess the potential efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) against serious enterococcal infections, we used a rat enterococcal endocarditis model comparing TMP-SMX therapy (500 mg of TMP plus 2,500 mg of SMX per kg of body weight per day given every 8 h by intragastric gavage) with intravenous ampicillin therapy (1,000 mg/kg per day). Despite concentrations of active drug in serum well in excess of the MIC and MBC, the mean residual vegetation bacterial titer in TMP-SMX-treated rats was similar to that in untreated controls (8.4 +/- 1.1 versus 8.6 +/- 1.3 log10 CFU/g) and significantly higher than that in the ampicillin-treated group (3.6 +/- 1.5 log10 CFU/g; P less than or equal to 0.001). This demonstrates discordance between in vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of TMP-SMX in serious enterococcal infection.

46 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on this short-term in vivo therapy study, oxacillin would be predicted to be clinically effective in the therapy of infections caused by borderlineOxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus, while the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam appears to be inferior to Oxacillin alone against such infections.
Abstract: Optimal therapy of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible, beta-lactamase-hyperproducing Staphylococcus aureus has not been established. We used a rat model of aortic valve endocarditis to examine efficacies of antibiotic regimens against a borderline oxacillin-susceptible strain as compared with a fully susceptible S. aureus strain. Animals were treated with oxacillin alone or in combination with sulbactam or with ampicillin-sulbactam combinations at two dose levels. Infections caused by the borderline susceptible and fully susceptible strains responded equally well to oxacillin alone, with residual bacterial titers in vegetations falling to 4.8 +/- 1.6 and 4.4 +/- 1.7 (mean +/- standard deviation) log10 CFU/g, respectively. Addition of sulbactam to oxacillin (1:2) did not enhance the efficacy of oxacillin against either strain in the animal model. A high-dose regimen of ampicillin-sulbactam (2:1) yielding mean (+/- standard deviation) levels in serum of 16.8 +/- 7.4 and 9.5 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml, respectively, proved equally effective against both strains (bacterial titers, 6.6 log10 CFU/g). However, at lower doses (8.3 +/- 2.6 and 5.9 +/- 2.4 micrograms/ml, the combination showed greater efficacy against the fully susceptible strain, with residual titers of 7.1 +/- 2.0 versus 9.0 +/- 1.6 log10 CFU/g (P less than 0.05). In vitro studies revealed that the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam was also a potent inducer of staphylococcal beta-lactamase at clinically relevant concentrations. Based on this short-term in vivo therapy study, oxacillin would be predicted to be clinically effective in the therapy of infections caused by borderline oxacillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus, while the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam appears to be inferior to oxacillin alone against such infections.

37 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Enterococci, in addition to their intrinsic resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, are also tolerant to the bactericidal activity of agents such as the penicillins and vancomycin, who have recently acquired resistance to a number of other clinically important antimicrobiat agents, including the various aminoglycosides.
Abstract: For many years enterococci have been considered to be relatively harmless commensals a part of the normal gut flora of man and other animals which, despite their ubiquitous occurrence in nature, are relatively rare causes of serious disease. In general terms this is true since enterococci do not possess the potent virulence factors found in many other bacterial species. However, enterococci possess a number of other characteristics which make them particularly capable of surviving and causing serious disease in the antibiotic era. These organisms are intrinsically resistant to a number of antimicrobial agents, including beta-lactam antibiotics (and other agents which inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis), the polymixins, and the lincosamides (1). They are also resistant to clinically achievable concentrations of aminoglycosides, but fortunately combinations of cell wall-active agents plus aminoglycosides produce synergistic killing of enterococci (2) and have been effectively utilized in the therapy of serious infections due to these organisms. This synergistic killing is particularly crucial in infections such as endocarditis and meningitis because enterococci, in addition to their intrinsic resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, are also tolerant to the bactericidal activity of agents such as the penicillins and vancomycin (3). To make matters worse, the enterococci have recently acquired resistance to a number of other clinically important antimicrobiat agents, including the various aminoglycosides. The first problem to be identified in this area was high level resistance to streptomycin, a phenomenon which was clearly defined in the early 1970s. Organisms with high level resistance to streptomycin were not killed synergistically by penicillin-streptomycin combinations, and such combinations were not effective therapeutically in infect ions with organisms requir ing bacter ic idal activity (3, 4). For tunate ly , combinations of penicillin plus gentamicin were shown to be effective (5) and penicillingentamicin therapy rapidly became the mainstay

32 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Results in this rat model of enterococcal endocarditis show that teicoplanin may prove useful in the treatment of serious infections due to high level-gentamicin-resistant enterococci in humans.
Abstract: Optimal therapy for the treatment of infections caused by strains of enterococci demonstrating high-level resistance to gentamicin and other aminoglycosides has not been established. The present study examined the efficacy of teicoplanin, a glycopeptide antibiotic active against gram-positive bacterial infections in various animal models, in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to a beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterococcus faecalis with high-level resistance to gentamicin. Vancomycin was used as a comparative antibiotic. In the first set of experiments, both antimicrobial agents were administered by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days at dosages which yielded comparable mean levels in serum (plus or minus the standard deviation) of 14.6 +/- 4.3 micrograms/ml for teicoplanin and 14.3 +/- 2.2 micrograms/ml for vancomycin. These regimens proved similarly effective in sterilizing cardiac vegetations (38 versus 50% of treated animals, respectively; P greater than 0.05). Mean (plus or minus the standard deviation) residual bacterial titers within vegetations were reduced to 3.2 +/- 1.2 log10 CFU/g and 3.4 +/- 1.7 log10 CFU/g, respectively. In separate experiments, the potential of teicoplanin to cure endocarditis was assessed, using two dosage regimens: (i) 30 mg/kg per day (mean level in serum, 13 micrograms/ml) for 10 days or (ii) 150 mg/kg per day (mean level in serum, 84 micrograms/ml) for 5 days. Surviving animals were sacrificed 10 days after the discontinuation of therapy. Both teicoplanin regimens were more effective than the comparative vancomycin (150 mg/kg per day) regimen: 92 versus 43% cured (P =0.025) in the standard-dose group, and 82 versus 37% cured (P = 0.015) in the high-dose group. Results in this rat model of enterococcal endocarditis show that teicoplanin may prove useful in the treatment of serious infections due to high level-gentamicin-resistant enterococci in humans.

28 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The in vitro activity of WIN 57273, a new fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, was evaluated against approximately 600 bacterial isolates as discussed by the authors, with the new drug inhibiting 90% of strains of each species except Enterococcus faecium at concentrations of less than or equal to 0.25 microgram/ml.
Abstract: The in vitro activity of WIN 57273, a new fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, was evaluated against approximately 600 bacterial isolates. The new drug was 4- to 128-fold more active than ciprofloxacin against a broad range of gram-positive organisms, with the new drug inhibiting 90% of strains of each species except Enterococcus faecium at concentrations of less than or equal to 0.25 microgram/ml. WIN 57273 was four- to eightfold less active than ciprofloxacin against many members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, but the MICs of the new drug for 90% of strains tested (MIC90s) were less than or equal to 8 micrograms/ml (range, 0.25 to 8 micrograms/ml) for all species. Branhamella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Legionella spp. were highly susceptible (MIC90s, less than or equal to 0.06 microgram/ml). WIN 57273 demonstrated excellent activity against anaerobes (MIC90s, less than or equal to 0.25 microgram/ml), and the drug was also more active than ciprofloxacin against 30 strains of Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare (MIC, 0.1 to 1.0 microgram/ml). The activity of WIN 57273 against gram-positive organisms was minimally affected by pH and increased at low pH (5.4) against gram-negative organisms. The bactericidal activity of WIN 57273 was demonstrated by time-kill techniques against selected organisms. The frequencies of spontaneous resistance to the new agent were low, but resistant colonies could be selected after serial passage of initially susceptible organisms through incremental concentrations of the drug.

19 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: BA v 3522 exhibited no significant advantage over cefaclor, cefuroxime, or cephalexin against gram-negative bacilli when tested against clinical bacterial isolates.
Abstract: The activity of BAY v 3522 was tested against over 500 clinical bacterial isolates and compared with the activities of ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefaclor, cefixime, cefuroxime, cephalexin, and/or ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and metronidazole. BAY v 3522 activity against staphylococci and streptococci equaled or exceeded those of the other agents. BAY v 3522 exhibited no significant advantage over cefaclor, cefuroxime, or cephalexin against gram-negative bacilli.

5 citations