scispace - formally typeset
R

Robert M. Losee

Researcher at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Publications -  62
Citations -  1304

Robert M. Losee is an academic researcher from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The author has contributed to research in topics: Relevance (information retrieval) & Document retrieval. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 62 publications receiving 1286 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A discipline independent definition of information

TL;DR: Models of communication, perception, observation, belief, and knowledge are suggested that are consistent with this conceptual framework of information as the value of the output of any process in a hierarchy of processes.
Book

Feedback in Information Retrieval.

TL;DR: In this article, a discussion concernant les different definitions of the notion of feedback ont emergees avec le developpement de la recherche d'informations and il etudie les relations des ces differentes vues avec la cybernetique and les modeles sociaux du feedback.
Book

Text Retrieval and Filtering: Analytic Models of Performance

TL;DR: The aim of this monograph is to clarify the role of language in the development of rankings and to suggest a methodology that can be used to improve the quality of rankings.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parameter Estimation for Probabilistic Document-Retrieval Models.

TL;DR: A proposal that parameters of distributions describing the distribution of features in nonrelevant documents be estimated from the parameters of the corresponding distributions of the entire database is tested; the confidence parameter of such an estimate resulting in the highest average precision is given.
Journal ArticleDOI

Learning syntactic rules and tags with genetic algorithms for information retrieval and filtering: an empirical basis for grammatical rules

TL;DR: The LUST system as discussed by the authors learns the characteristics of the language or sublanguage used in document abstracts by learning from the document rankings obtained from the parsed abstracts, without the prior imposition of some common grammatical assumptions (e.g. part-of-speech assumptions).