scispace - formally typeset
R

Robin Fincham

Researcher at University of Stirling

Publications -  45
Citations -  3391

Robin Fincham is an academic researcher from University of Stirling. The author has contributed to research in topics: Intellectual capital & Individual capital. The author has an hindex of 25, co-authored 45 publications receiving 3248 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Within and beyond communities of practice : making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice.

TL;DR: The notion of communities of practice is a core concept in situated learning theory as mentioned in this paper, but it is sometimes difficult to distinguish conceptually between the terms 'participation' and 'practice' because of occasional duplication of meaning.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the consultant-client relationship is best regarded as part of an overarching managerial structure and a contingent exchange that assumes a variety of forms, and they draw on case studies of consultants' role in the management of organizational change, one of clients with considerable market power, and another of interdependency between consultant and client.
Journal ArticleDOI

Thinking critically about intellectual capital accounting

TL;DR: The measurement and reporting of intellectual capital has recently attracted a growing interest from accounting researchers, promoting a lively and far-reaching debate as discussed by the authors, and two related issues have informed this debate.
Journal Article

Critical consulting : new perspectives on the management advice industry

TL;DR: Fincham et al. as mentioned in this paper discussed the nature of management consultancy and management advice, and the role of Gurus and managers in the evolution of the management consultancies.
Posted Content

Narratives of Success and Failure in Systems Development

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore a narrative perspective on "success" and "failure" in computer systems development and reveal the limitations of process models of IT success/failure, though these stress a more complex form of decision making around IT.