Maximum likelihood or restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimates of the parameters in linear mixed-effects models can be determined using the lmer function in the lme4 package for R. As for most model-fitting functions in R, the model is described in an lmer call by a formula, in this case including both fixed- and random-effects terms. The formula and data together determine a numerical representation of the model from which the profiled deviance or the profiled REML criterion can be evaluated as a function of some of the model parameters. The appropriate criterion is optimized, using one of the constrained optimization functions in R, to provide the parameter estimates. We describe the structure of the model, the steps in evaluating the profiled deviance or REML criterion, and the structure of classes or types that represents such a model. Sufficient detail is included to allow specialization of these structures by users who wish to write functions to fit specialized linear mixed models, such as models incorporating pedigrees or smoothing splines, that are not easily expressible in the formula language used by lmer.

/pdf/fitting-linear-mixed-effects-models-using-lme4-4zzrpoy9lh.pdf

Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

The tutorial starts with an overview of the concepts of VC dimension and structural risk minimization. We then describe linear Support Vector Machines (SVMs) for separable and non-separable data, working through a non-trivial example in detail. We describe a mechanical analogy, and discuss when SVM solutions are unique and when they are global. We describe how support vector training can be practically implemented, and discuss in detail the kernel mapping technique which is used to construct SVM solutions which are nonlinear in the data. We show how Support Vector machines can have very large (even infinite) VC dimension by computing the VC dimension for homogeneous polynomial and Gaussian radial basis function kernels. While very high VC dimension would normally bode ill for generalization performance, and while at present there exists no theory which shows that good generalization performance is guaranteed for SVMs, there are several arguments which support the observed high accuracy of SVMs, which we review. Results of some experiments which were inspired by these arguments are also presented. We give numerous examples and proofs of most of the key theorems. There is new material, and I hope that the reader will find that even old material is cast in a fresh light.

/pdf/a-tutorial-on-support-vector-machines-for-pattern-5cn6x20psd.pdf

A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition

Many areas of science depend on exploratory data analysis and visualization. The need to analyze large amounts of multivariate data raises the fundamental problem of dimensionality reduction: how to discover compact representations of high-dimensional data. Here, we introduce locally linear embedding (LLE), an unsupervised learning algorithm that computes low-dimensional, neighborhood-preserving embeddings of high-dimensional inputs. Unlike clustering methods for local dimensionality reduction, LLE maps its inputs into a single global coordinate system of lower dimensionality, and its optimizations do not involve local minima. By exploiting the local symmetries of linear reconstructions, LLE is able to learn the global structure of nonlinear manifolds, such as those generated by images of faces or documents of text.

/pdf/nonlinear-dimensionality-reduction-by-locally-linear-vmiazg4oee.pdf

Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding.

In this paper, we discuss consensus problems for networks of dynamic agents with fixed and switching topologies. We analyze three cases: 1) directed networks with fixed topology; 2) directed networks with switching topology; and 3) undirected networks with communication time-delays and fixed topology. We introduce two consensus protocols for networks with and without time-delays and provide a convergence analysis in all three cases. We establish a direct connection between the algebraic connectivity (or Fiedler eigenvalue) of the network and the performance (or negotiation speed) of a linear consensus protocol. This required the generalization of the notion of algebraic connectivity of undirected graphs to digraphs. It turns out that balanced digraphs play a key role in addressing average-consensus problems. We introduce disagreement functions for convergence analysis of consensus protocols. A disagreement function is a Lyapunov function for the disagreement network dynamics. We proposed a simple disagreement function that is a common Lyapunov function for the disagreement dynamics of a directed network with switching topology. A distinctive feature of this work is to address consensus problems for networks with directed information flow. We provide analytical tools that rely on algebraic graph theory, matrix theory, and control theory. Simulations are provided that demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretical results.

/pdf/consensus-problems-in-networks-of-agents-with-switching-25c3hqvtd8.pdf

Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays

Preface 1. Introduction Overview A Brief History of LMIs in Control Theory Notes on the Style of the Book Origin of the Book 2. Some Standard Problems Involving LMIs. Linear Matrix Inequalities Some Standard Problems Ellipsoid Algorithm Interior-Point Methods Strict and Nonstrict LMIs Miscellaneous Results on Matrix Inequalities Some LMI Problems with Analytic Solutions 3. Some Matrix Problems. Minimizing Condition Number by Scaling Minimizing Condition Number of a Positive-Definite Matrix Minimizing Norm by Scaling Rescaling a Matrix Positive-Definite Matrix Completion Problems Quadratic Approximation of a Polytopic Norm Ellipsoidal Approximation 4. Linear Differential Inclusions. Differential Inclusions Some Specific LDIs Nonlinear System Analysis via LDIs 5. Analysis of LDIs: State Properties. Quadratic Stability Invariant Ellipsoids 6. Analysis of LDIs: Input/Output Properties. Input-to-State Properties State-to-Output Properties Input-to-Output Properties 7. State-Feedback Synthesis for LDIs. Static State-Feedback Controllers State Properties Input-to-State Properties State-to-Output Properties Input-to-Output Properties Observer-Based Controllers for Nonlinear Systems 8. Lure and Multiplier Methods. Analysis of Lure Systems Integral Quadratic Constraints Multipliers for Systems with Unknown Parameters 9. Systems with Multiplicative Noise. Analysis of Systems with Multiplicative Noise State-Feedback Synthesis 10. Miscellaneous Problems. Optimization over an Affine Family of Linear Systems Analysis of Systems with LTI Perturbations Positive Orthant Stabilizability Linear Systems with Delays Interpolation Problems The Inverse Problem of Optimal Control System Realization Problems Multi-Criterion LQG Nonconvex Multi-Criterion Quadratic Problems Notation List of Acronyms Bibliography Index.

/pdf/linear-matrix-inequalities-in-system-and-control-theory-2q5cf0pqm2.pdf

Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory

Eigenvalue inequalities and equalities

A regularization algorithm for matrices of bilinear and sesquilinear forms

The spectral and Jordan structures of the web hyperlink matrix G(c) = cG + (1 - c)evT have been analyzed when G is the basic (stochastic) Google matrix, c is a real parameter such that 0 < c < 1, v is a nonnegative probability vector, and e is the all-ones vector. Typical studies have relied heavily on special properties of nonnegative, positive, and stochastic matrices. There is a unique nonnegative vector y(c) such that y(c) TG(c) = y(c) T and y(c) T e = 1. This PageRank vector y(c)can be computed effectively by the power method. We consider a square complex matrix A and nonzero complex vectors x and v such that Ax = λx and v*x = 1. We use standard matrix analytic tools to determine the eigenvalues, the Jordan blocks, and a distinguished left λ-eigenvector of A(c) = cA + (1 - c)λxv* as a function of a complex variable c. If λ is a semisimple eigenvalue of A, there is a uniquely determined projection P such that lim c→1 y(c) = Pv for every v such that v*x = 1; this limit may fail to exist for some v if λ...

/pdf/a-general-setting-for-the-parametric-google-matrix-1quic1jahx.pdf

A General Setting for the Parametric Google Matrix

Matrix Analysis: Preface to the Second Edition

We give several criteria that are equivalent to the basic singular value majorization inequality (1.1) that is common to both the usual and Hadamard products. We then use these criteria to give a unified proof of the basic majorization inequality for both products. Finally, we introduce natural generalizations of the usual and Hadamard products and show that although these generalizations do not satisfy the majorization inequality, they do satisfy an important weaker inequality that plays a role in establishing their submultiplicativity with respect to every unitarily invariant norm.

Roger A. Horn

Papers

Eigenvalue inequalities and equalities

A regularization algorithm for matrices of bilinear and sesquilinear forms

A General Setting for the Parametric Google Matrix

Matrix Analysis: Preface to the Second Edition

Inequalities for unitarily invariant norms and bilinear matrix products