scispace - formally typeset
R

Roland Strausz

Researcher at Humboldt University of Berlin

Publications -  86
Citations -  2456

Roland Strausz is an academic researcher from Humboldt University of Berlin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Incentive & Collusion. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 84 publications receiving 2209 citations. Previous affiliations of Roland Strausz include Free University of Berlin & Humboldt State University.

Papers
More filters
MonographDOI

An introduction to the theory of mechanism design

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present an overview of Bayesian mechanism design in the context of robust and robust mechanism design, including the following: 1. Screening 3. Bayesian Mechanism Design: Examples 4. Dominant Strategy Mechanisms: Examples 5. Incentive Compatibility 6. Bayes Mechanisms Design 7. Non-Transferrable Utility 8. Informational Interdependence 9. Robust Mechanism design 10. Dynamic Mechanism Development 11.
Journal ArticleDOI

Contracting with Imperfect Commitment and the Revelation Principle: The Single Agent Case

TL;DR: In this article, the revelation principle is applied to contracting problems between a principal and a single agent, where the principal may optimally use a direct mechanism under which truthful revelation is an optimal strategy for the agent.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Theory of Crowdfunding: A Mechanism Design Approach with Demand Uncertainty and Moral Hazard

TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on the trade-off between value screening and moral hazard, and characterizes optimal mechanisms for crowdfunding in terms of return on investment and the degree of moral hazard.
Journal ArticleDOI

Delegation of Monitoring in a Principal-Agent Relationship

TL;DR: In this article, a principal-agent relationship with moral hazard was studied, where the principal or the supervisor can monitor the agent's hidden action by using identical monitoring technologies, and it was shown that delegation of monitoring to the supervisor is profitable because of two effects.
Journal ArticleDOI

Honest certification and the threat of capture

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors derive conditions under which reputation enables certifiers to resist capture and show that honest certification requires high prices that may even exceed the static monopoly price, and thus constitutes a natural monopoly.