R
Roland Strausz
Researcher at Humboldt University of Berlin
Publications - 86
Citations - 2456
Roland Strausz is an academic researcher from Humboldt University of Berlin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Incentive & Collusion. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 84 publications receiving 2209 citations. Previous affiliations of Roland Strausz include Free University of Berlin & Humboldt State University.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
A Theory of Crowdfunding
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a crowdfunding platform that enables consumers to contract with consumers before investment under aggregate demand uncertainty, which improves screening for valuable projects and promotes welfare and complements traditional entrepreneurial financing, which focuses on controlling moral hazard.
Posted Content
Deterministic versus Stochastic Mechanisms in Principal–Agent Models
TL;DR: In this article, it was shown that decreasing concavity of the agent's utility function with respect to the screening variable is not sufficient to ensure that stochastic mechanisms are suboptimal.
Posted ContentDOI
Optimal Information Revelation by Informed Investors
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied the structure of optimal finance contracts in an agency model of outside finance, when investors possess private information, and they showed that, depending on the intensity of the entrepreneur's moral hazard problem, optimal contracts induce full, partial, or no revelation of the investor's private information.
Optimal Non-Linear Pricing with Data-Sensitive Consumers
Roland Strausz,Daniel Krähmer +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce consumers with intrinsic privacy preferences into the monopolistic non-linear pricing model, and they show that a privacy mechanism is optimal if privacy costs are large and that it yields classical consumers a higher utility than data-sensitive consumers with the same valuation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Ordinary Shares and Managers
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that ordinary shares undermine any inherent commitment of its holders to resist renegotiating away ex post inefficiencies, and they show that shareholders may use a manager in combination with a golden parachute (managerial severance payments) as a commitment device not to renegotiate ex post.