Background A large body of evidence has confirmed that patients with spinal deformity, lumbar fusion, and abnormal spinopelvic mobility are at significantly increased risk for instability, dislocation, and revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods Achieving a stable construct in patients with pre-existing spine disease requires an understanding of basic spinopelvic parameters and the compensatory mechanisms associated with abnormal spinopelvic motion. Indicated patients with concomitant hip-spine pathology should be assessed for (1) the presence of spinal deformity and (2) the presence of spinal stiffness before undergoing THA. Preoperative imaging should include a standing anteroposterior pelvis x-ray, as well as two lateral spinopelvic radiographs in the standing and seated position. Results Based on the presence of spinal deformity and/or spinal stiffness, patients may be categorized as one of the four groups of the “Hip-Spine Classification in THA.” A series of illustrative case examples is provided. Conclusion A simple three-step assessment with minimal measurements will effectively identify the complex “hip-spine” THA patient at high risk for postoperative instability. Adhering to group-specific recommendations for acetabular cup position can help to further reduce the burden of instability and related revisions in this challenging population.

A Preoperative Workup of a "Hip-Spine" Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient: A Simplified Approach to a Complex Problem.

Death of the Lewinnek "Safe Zone".

Aims This study of patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip aimed to: 1) characterize the contribution of the hip, spinopelvic complex, and lumbar spine when moving from the standing to the sit...

Can spinopelvic mobility be predicted in patients awaiting total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, diagnostic study of patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis.

The stability of a total hip arthroplasty relies on proper positioning of the acetabular cup. Recent research has shown that this cup position is more dynamic than previously thought. The 3-dimensional orientation of the acetabular cup changes when the pelvis tilts anteriorly or posteriorly. These changes in pelvic tilt are directly related to the biomechanics of the lumbosacral junction. In normal physiology, the lumbar spine straightens with sitting and becomes more lordotic with standing. This directly translates to posterior or anterior pelvic tilt due to the rigid sacroiliac attachments. During sitting, increased posterior pelvic tilt opens the acetabulum to accommodate flexion and internal rotation of the hip. This helps prevent anterior impingement and posterior hip dislocation. During standing, anterior pelvic tilt increases superior coverage of the acetabulum. This helps prevent posterior impingement and anterior hip dislocations. When lumbosacral motion becomes pathologic, spinopelvic motion changes and acetabular cup orientation is affected. In cases of decreased lumbosacral motion, patients rely on greater hip motion to reach standing or sitting positions. This can cause pathologic impingement. In addition, traditional safe zones for cup position may not apply in the presence of pathologic spinopelvic motion. This article discusses the normal physiology of spinopelvic motion, the patterns of pathologic change, and the clinical implications therein.

Spinopelvic Motion and Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Spinopelvic mobility represents the complex interaction of hip, pelvis, and spine. Understanding this interaction is relevant for both arthroplasty and spine surgeons, as a predicted increasing number of patients will suffer from hip and spinal pathologies simultaneously. We conducted a comprehensive literature review, defined the nomenclature, summarized the various classifications of spinopelvic mobility, and outlined the corresponding treatment algorithms. In addition, we developed a step-by-step workup for spinopelvic mobility and total hip arthroplasty (THA). Normal spinopelvic mobility changes from standing to sitting; the hip flexes, and the posterior pelvic tilt increases with a concomitant increase in acetabular anteversion and decreasing lumbar lordosis. Most classifications are based on a division of spinopelvic mobility based on ΔSS (sacral slope) into stiff, normal, and hypermobile, and a categorization of the sagittal spinal balance regarding pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch (PI–LL = ± 10° balanced versus PI–LL > 10° unbalanced) and corresponding adjustment of the acetabular component implantation. When performing THA, patients with suspected pathologic spinopelvic mobility should be identified by medical history and examination, and a radiological evaluation (a.p. pelvis standing and lateral femur to L1 or C7 (if EOS (EOS imaging, Paris, France) is available), respectively, for standing and sitting radiographs) of spinopelvic parameters should be conducted in order to classify the patient and determine the appropriate treatment strategy. Spine surgeons, before planned spinal fusion in the presence of osteoarthritis of the hip, should consider a hip flexion contracture and inform the patient of an increased risk of complications with existing or planned THA.

The Impact of Spinopelvic Mobility on Arthroplasty: Implications for Hip and Spine Surgeons.

Background The Lewinnek “safe zone” is not always predictive of stability after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Recent studies have focused on functional hip motion as observed on lateral spine-pelvis-hip x-rays. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between the Lewinnek safe zone and the functional safe zone based on hip and pelvic motion in the sagittal plane. Methods Three hundred twenty hips (291 patients) underwent primary THA using computer navigation. Two hundred ninety-six of these hips (92.5%) were within the Lewinnek safe zone as determined by inclination of 40° ± 10° and anteversion of 15° ± 10°. All patients had preoperative and postoperative standing and sitting lateral spinopelvic x-rays. The combined sagittal index (CSI), a combination of sagittal acetabular and femoral position, was measured for each patient and used to assess the functional safe zone. Data analysis was performed to identify hips in the Lewinnek safe zone inside and outside the sagittal functional safe zone. Predictive factors for hips outside the functional safe zone were identified. Results Of the 296 hips within the Lewinnek safe zone, 254 (85.8%) were also in the functional safe zone. Forty-two patients were outside the functional safe zone based on CSI; 19 had an increased standing CSI and 23 had a decreased sitting CSI, all were considered at risk for dislocation. Predictive factors for falling outside the functional safe zone were increased femoral mobility (P Conclusion In this study, 14.2% of hips within the Lewinnek safe zone were outside the functional safe zone, identifying a potential reason hips dislocate despite having “normal” cup angles. The best predictor for falling outside the functional safe zone, both preoperatively and postoperatively, was femoral mobility, not the sagittal cup position (ie, cup anteinclination). Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective review.

Functional Safe Zone Is Superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek Safe Zone Is Not Always Predictive of Stability

BACKGROUND The spine-pelvis-hip interaction during postural change should be considered in the functional anatomy of the hip. The component parts of this anatomy and how they influence hip function are important to know. Pelvic incidence (PI) is one of these components. We studied if PI was preoperatively predictive of impingement risk and if it postoperatively influences hip position, which could cause outliers from the functional safe zone of hip replacement. METHODS This was a prospective radiographic study of 187 consecutive patients (200 hips) who had lateral spinopelvis-hip radiographs before and after primary total hip arthroplasty with measurements of the component factors that influence mobility and position of the functional anatomy. The predictive value of PI for risk of impingement of the hip and its postoperative relationship to functional safe-zone outliers were assessed. Forty-one dislocations from our clinical practice were also reviewed. RESULTS Of 200 hips, the PI was normal in 145 hips (73%), low in 18 hips (9%), and high in 37 hips (19%). Eighty-two hips had spinopelvic imbalance: 12 (67%) of the 18 hips with low PI, 56 (39%) of the 145 hips with normal PI, and 14 (38%) of the 37 hips with high PI. Low-PI hips was the most predictive of the risk of impingement and postoperatively these hips had the most outliers from the functional safe zone. CONCLUSIONS PI is an anatomical component that is predictive of both impingement risk and functional safe-zone outliers. Preoperative risk, based on factors such as the Lewinnek zones and combined anteversion, is an established guide in determining cup position in hip replacement. Low-PI hips that have the "terrible triad" of a posteriorly tilted pelvis, stiff pelvic mobility, and increased femoral flexion therefore have no functional safe zone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Effects of Pelvic Incidence in the Functional Anatomy of the Hip Joint.

Background The functional anatomy of the osteoarthritic hip joint in the sagittal plane has not been defined. The purpose of this study was to define the functional anatomy of the hip using clinical and radiographic analyses. Methods 320 hips had preoperative standing and sitting lateral spine-pelvis-hip X-rays. Radiographic pelvic measurements were pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS), and hip measurements were anteinclination (AI) and pelvic femoral angle (PFA). Pelvic tilt (PT) was calculated as PI-SS. A triangle model was created from the clinical data that illustrates the functional motion of the hip during postural changes from standing to sitting. Results Pelvic motion was coordinated with hip motion, even with spinopelvic imbalance and stiffness. Pelvic motion (ΔSS) varied for all 5 types of imbalance, but pelvic motion (ΔSS) and acetabular motion (ΔAI) changed with a 1:1 ratio and inversely with femoral motion (ΔPFA) with a 1:1 ratio. The triangle model showed similar results with ΔSS, ΔPT, and ΔAI changing in a 1:1:1 ratio, and femur motion inversely changing with a 1:1 ratio. Conclusion The functional anatomy of the hip joint can be visually illustrated using a triangle model. Pelvic angles SS, PT, and AI change in unison, whereas femoral motion (ΔPFA) changes inversely with pelvic motion (ΔSS) in a 1:1 ratio. This coordinated mobility explains the limitations of the Lewinnek safe zone, which include only the acetabulum.

Functional Anatomy of the Hip Joint.

Total hip arthroplasty functional safe zones match postural hip changes to dynamic positioning of the acetabular component. We studied integrating the Anteinclination (AI) cup angle into the spinopelvic environment, defining normative values for all parameters and calculating adjustments to AI for each degree of altered standing pelvic position and postural mobility from these values. A sagittal geometric model was employed to determine these values using established spinopelvic parameter angles.Theoretical normative Pelvic Incidence (PI) specific values were calculated using a triangular construct employing a linear equation describing the functional relationship between the pelvic parameters at a mobility producing an isosceles solution for normative acetabular angles. Individual optimal AI cup values for altered Sacral Slope (SS)/pelvic tilt (sPT) and mobility (dSS) were calculated using specific ratios of angular change between parameters correcting from these normative values.A PI:SS:sPT ratio of angular change of 3:2:1 at dSS = 25° mobility creates an isosceles condition solving for PI specific theoretical normative values for all construct parameters. Individualized tilt correction applies to each posture a +0.25° AI alteration for each +1° sPT increase from this architectural value. Mobility correction applies a +0.5° standing AI and -0.5° sitting AI alteration for each -1° dSS < 25°, the opposite for each +1° dSS > 25°. The Sacroacetabular angle/Pelvic acetabular angle (SAA/PAA) index describes the underlying spinopelvic environment the cup functions within.This model quantitatively integrates an implanted acetabular component into the host spinopelvic environment. Theoretical normative and individual optimal cup orientations are passively determined by these conditions of standing pelvic position and mobility. 

The Functional Mechanics of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Letter to the Editor on "How Can Patients With Mobile Hips and Stiff Lumbar Spines be Identified Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Prospective Diagnostic Cohort Study".

Russell J. Bodner

Papers

Functional Safe Zone Is Superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Why the Lewinnek Safe Zone Is Not Always Predictive of Stability

The Effects of Pelvic Incidence in the Functional Anatomy of the Hip Joint.

Functional Anatomy of the Hip Joint.

The Functional Mechanics of the Acetabular Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Letter to the Editor on "How Can Patients With Mobile Hips and Stiff Lumbar Spines be Identified Prior to Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Prospective Diagnostic Cohort Study".