R
Ryan J. Owens
Researcher at University of Wisconsin-Madison
Publications - 60
Citations - 1128
Ryan J. Owens is an academic researcher from University of Wisconsin-Madison. The author has contributed to research in topics: Supreme court & Majority opinion. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 60 publications receiving 1041 citations. Previous affiliations of Ryan J. Owens include Washington University in St. Louis & Harvard University.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence
Ryan C. Black,Ryan J. Owens +1 more
TL;DR: The authors show that while justices are largely motivated by policy concerns, jurisprudential considerations can prevail over their policy goals when policy goals and legal considerations collide, policy gives way.
Journal ArticleDOI
Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of U.S. Supreme Court Opinions
Ryan J. Owens,Justin Wedeking +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a systematic examination of the clarity of Supreme Court opinions and discover five important results: Justices systematically craft clearer opinions than others, and all justices write clearer dissents than majority opinions while minimum winning coalitions produce the clearest majority opinions.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting
TL;DR: In this article, the authors employ the first systematic empirical analysis that relies on archival data to examine whether the separation of powers influences justices' agenda votes and find that justices are uninfluenced by the separation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence
Ryan C. Black,Ryan J. Owens +1 more
TL;DR: The authors show that while justices are largely motivated by policy concerns, jurisprudential considerations can prevail over their policy goals when policy goals and legal considerations collide, policy gives way.
Journal ArticleDOI
Justices and Legal Clarity: Analyzing the Complexity of Supreme Court Opinions
Ryan J. Owens,Justin Wedeking +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide a systematic examination of the clarity of Supreme Court opinions and discover five important results: certain justices systematically craft clearer opinions than others, and all justices write clearer dissents than majority opinions.