scispace - formally typeset
S

S.M. Perren

Researcher at AO Foundation

Publications -  20
Citations -  1187

S.M. Perren is an academic researcher from AO Foundation. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fracture fixation & Osteosynthesis. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 20 publications receiving 1104 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Force transfer between the plate and the bone : relative importance of the bending stiffness of the screws and the friction between plate and bone

TL;DR: Experiments performed in vivo and in vitro show that with conventional plates, motion is prevented by friction and depends upon the axial force of the screw, pressing the plate onto the bone, and with newly developed internal fixators, the motion is preventing by the structural stiffness of the plate-screw system.
Journal ArticleDOI

The influence of cyclic compression and distraction on the healing of experimental tibial fractures.

TL;DR: A higher number of enforced and maintained compressive displacements enhanced periosteal callus formation but did not allow bony bridging of the gap, and cyclic compressive displacement were found to be superior over distractive displacements.
Journal ArticleDOI

Loads acting in an intramedullary nail during fracture healing in the human femur.

TL;DR: A telemetrized, interlocking femoral nail for wireless transmission of forces and moments acting across the fracture site was developed and implanted in a 33-year-old patient who had sustained a multifragmentary fracture of the left femur.
Journal ArticleDOI

The biomechanics of the PC-Fix internal fixator

TL;DR: Most of the advantages of the PC-Fix observed to date in in vivo experimental fracture treatment can be explained by the reduction of implant-related damage to the bone without any compromise on the mechanical function of fracture stabilization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stress protection due to plates: myth or reality? A parametric analysis made using the composite beam theory.

TL;DR: A theoretical analysis using composite beam theory, with different loading conditions (axial load and bending), demonstrates that stress protection, i.e. early temporary porosis, is a myth.