scispace - formally typeset
S

S. Mark Scott

Researcher at Queen Mary University of London

Publications -  101
Citations -  3311

S. Mark Scott is an academic researcher from Queen Mary University of London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Constipation & Fecal incontinence. The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 100 publications receiving 2436 citations. Previous affiliations of S. Mark Scott include Royal London Hospital & Barts Health NHS Trust.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The effect of probiotics on functional constipation in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

TL;DR: Investigating the effect of probiotics on gut transit time, stool output, and constipation symptoms in adults with functional constipation via a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials indicated beneficial effects of B. lactis in particular.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics and the Gastrointestinal Microbiota on Gut Motility and Constipation

TL;DR: Modifying the gut luminal environment with certain probiotic strains may affect motility and secretion in the gut and, hence, provide a benefit for patients with constipation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diagnostic accuracy study of anorectal manometry for diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation

TL;DR: While the interpretation of AM patterns is reproducible, nearly 90% of HV have a pattern that is currently regarded as ‘abnormal’ by AM, Hence, AM is of limited utility for distinguishing between FC and HV.
Journal ArticleDOI

Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function

TL;DR: An appraisal of the current indications, study performance characteristics, clinical utility, strengths and limitations of the most widely available tests of anorectal structure and function and the consensus on the clinical relevance of these tests are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Physiology of Human Defecation

TL;DR: The current understanding of normal defecation, including recent advances, is detailed, but importantly those areas where knowledge or consensus is still lacking are identified.