T raditionally, works on research design (most of which focus on quantitative research) have understood " design " in one of two ways. Some take designs to be fixed, standard arrangements of research conditions and methods that have their own coherence and logic, as possible answers to the question, " What research design are you using? " (e.g., Campbell & Stanley, 1967). For example, a randomized, double-blind experiment is one research design; an interrupted time-series design is another. Beyond such broad categories as ethnographies, qualitative interview studies, and case studies (which often overlap), qualitative research lacks any such elaborate typology into which studies can be pigeonholed. In addition, typologies are usually based on a limited number of features of the study, and by themselves do little to clarify the actual functioning and interrelationship of the component parts of a design. Other models present design as a logical progression of stages or tasks, from problem formulation to the generation of conclusions or theory, that are necessary in planning or carrying out a study (e.g., Creswell, 1997; Marshall & Rossman, 1999). Such models usually resemble a flowchart with a clear starting point and goal and a specified order for doing the intermediate tasks. Although some versions of this approach are circular or iterative (see, e.g., Bickman & Rog, Chapter 1, this volume), so that later steps connect back to earlier ones, all such models are linear in the sense that they are made up of one-directional sequences of steps that represent what is seen as the optimal order for conceptualizing or conducting the different components or activities of a study. Neither of these models adequately represents the logic and process of qualitative research. In a qualitative study, " research design should be a reflexive process operating through every stage of a project "

/pdf/designing-a-qualitative-study-2bvqwewdza.pdf

Designing a qualitative study.

This paper provides a framework for developing sampling designs in mixed methods research. First, we present sampling schemes that have been associated with quantitative and qualitative research. Second, we discuss sample size considerations and provide sample size recommendations for each of the major research designs for quantitative and qualitative approaches. Third, we provide a sampling design typology and we demonstrate how sampling designs can be classified according to time orientation of the components and relationship of the qualitative and quantitative sample. Fourth, we present four major crises to mixed methods research and indicate how each crisis may be used to guide sampling design considerations. Finally, we emphasize how sampling design impacts the extent to which researchers can generalize their findings. Key Words: Sampling Schemes, Qualitative Research, Generalization, Parallel Sampling Designs, Pairwise Sampling Designs, Subgroup Sampling Designs, Nested Sampling Designs, and Multilevel Sampling Designs

/pdf/a-typology-of-mixed-methods-sampling-designs-in-social-30zphdo6ha.pdf

A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research

The mixed methods paradigm is still in its adolescence, and, thus, is still relatively unknown and confusing to many researchers. In general, mixed methods research represents research that involves collecting, analyzing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data in a single study or in a series of studies that investigate the same underlying phenomenon. Over the last several years, a plethora of research designs have been developed. However, the number of designs that currently prevail leaves the doctoral student, the beginning researcher, and even the experienced researcher who is new to the field of mixed methods research with the challenge of selecting optimal mixed methods designs. This paper presents a three-dimensional typology of mixed methods designs that represents an attempt to rise to the challenge of creating an integrated typology of mixed methods designs. An example for each design is included as well as a notation system that fits our eight-design framework.

A typology of mixed methods research designs

Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

A thorough, sophisticated literature review is the foundation and inspiration for substantial, useful research. The complex nature of education research demands such thorough, sophisticated reviews. Although doctoral education is a key means for improving education research, the literature has given short shrift to the dissertation literature review. This article suggests criteria to evaluate the quality of dissertation literature reviews and reports a study that examined dissertations at three universities. Acquiring the skills and knowledge required to be education scholars, able to analyze and synthesize the research in a field of specialization, should be the focal, integrative activity of predissertation doctoral education. Such scholarship is a prerequisite for increased methodological sophistication and for improving the usefulness of education research.

/pdf/scholars-before-researchers-on-the-centrality-of-the-407rx4as40.pdf

Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation

I. FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. 1. Introduction to the Field of Educational Research. 2. Research Designs, Data Collection Techniques, and Research Reports. 3. Research Problems: Statements, Questions, and Hypotheses. 4. Literature Review. II. QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS. 5. Introduction to Designing Quantitative Research. 6. Descriptive Statistics. 7. Data Collection Techniques. 8. Nonexperimental Research Designs. 9. Experimental and Single-Subject Research Designs. 10. Inferential Statistics. III. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS. 11. Introduction to Designing Qualitative Research. 12. Ethnographic Research. 13. Analytical Research: Historical and Legal Studies. 14. Qualitative Data Analysis. IV. EVALUATION AND POLICY RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS. 15. Evaluation Research and Policy Analysis. V. COMMUNICATION OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. 16. Guidelines for Research Proposals.

Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction

Chapter 1: Introduction to Evidence-Based Inquiry Chapter 2: Research Designs and Reading Research Reports Chapter 3: Research Problems, Questions and Hypotheses Chapter 4: Review of Literature Chapter 5: Designing Quantitative Research: Purpose, Validity, and Ethical Considerations Chapter 6: Participants, Subjects and Sampling for Quantitative Designs Chapter 7: Descriptive Statistics Chapter 8: Quantitative Data Collection: Technical Adequacy Chapter 9: Collecting Quantitative Data Chapter 10: Nonexperimental Research Designs, Surveys, and Secondary Data Analysis Chapter 11: Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, and Single-Subject Designs Chapter 12: Understanding and Reporting Inferential Data Analyses Chapter 13: Designing Qualitative Research Chapter 14: Collecting Qualitative Data Chapter 15: Qualitative Data Analysis Chapter 16: Mixed-Methods Designs Chapter 17: Concept Analysis and Historical Research Chapter 18: Evaluation Research and Policy Analysis Chapter 19: Action Research Appendix A: Answers to Application Problems Appendix B: Guidelines for Writing Research Proposals Appendix C: Guidelines for Writing Research Reports Appendix D: Glossary Appendix E: Calculations for Selected Descriptive and Inferential Statistics

Sally Schumacher

Papers

Research in Education: A Conceptual Introduction

Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry

Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry, 7th Edition. MyEducationLab Series.

Research in Education

Investigacion educativa: una introducción conceptual