Preface.- Introduction.- Glossary of Notation.- I First Concepts.- 1 Two Definitions of Lattices.- 2 How to Describe Lattices.- 3 Some Basic Concepts.- 4 Terms, Identities, and Inequalities.- 5 Free Lattices.- 6 Special Elements.- II Distributive Lattices.- 1 Characterization and Representation Theorems.- 2 Terms and Freeness.- 3 Congruence Relations.- 4 Boolean Algebras.- 5 Topological Representation.- 6 Pseudocomplementation.- III Congruences.- 1 Congruence Spreading.- 2 Distributive, Standard, and Neutral Elements.- 3 Distributive, Standard, and Neutral Ideals.- 4 Structure Theorems.- IV Lattice Constructions.- 1 Adding an Element.- 2 Gluing.- 3 Chopped Lattices.- 4 Constructing Lattices with Given Congruence Lattices.- 5 Boolean Triples.- V Modular and Semimodular Lattices.- 1 Modular Lattices.- 2 Semimodular Lattices.- 3 Geometric Lattices.- 4 Partition Lattices.- 5 Complemented Modular Lattices.- VI Varieties of Lattices.- 1 Characterizations of Varieties 397.- 2 The Lattice of Varieties of Lattices.- 3 Finding Equational Bases.- 4 The Amalgamation Property.- VII Free Products.- 1 Free Products of Lattices.- 2 The Structure of Free Lattices.- 3 Reduced Free Products.- 4 Hopfian Lattices.- Afterword.- Bibliography.

https://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/productFlyer/productFlyer_978-3-0348-0017-4.pdf?SGWID=0-0-1297-174034875-0

Lattice Theory: Foundation

This is a direct continuation of Shellable Nonpure Complexes and Posets. I, which appeared in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 348 (1996), 1299-1327. 8. Interval-generated lattices and dominance order In this section and the following one we will continue exemplifying the applicability of lexicographic shellability to nonpure posets. Let F = {I1, I2, . . . , In} be a family of intervals of integers, by which is meant sets of the form [a, b] = {a, a + 1, . . . , b}, a ≤ b. We assume that there are no containments among these intervals, and that they are ordered so that their left and right endpoints are increasing. Let L(F) be the lattice of all sets that are unions of subfamilies of F , ordered by inclusion. Such interval-generated lattices L(F) were introduced and studied by Greene [G]. Define an edge-labeling λ of L(F) as follows. If A → B is a covering and a = max(B \A), then λ(A→ B) = { −a, if (a+ 1) ∈ A and a is the left endpoint of some I ∈ F ,

/pdf/shellable-nonpure-complexes-and-posets-ii-7mthqkp11j.pdf

Shellable nonpure complexes and posets. II

A topological representation theory for lattices

/pdf/intervals-in-catalan-lattices-and-realizers-of-27ytv4wyeq.pdf

Intervals in Catalan lattices and realizers of triangulations

This paper studies certain types of join and meet-irreducibles called coprimes and primes. These elements can be used to characterize certain types of lattices. For example, a lattice is distributive if and only if every join-irreducible is coprime. Similarly, a lattice is meet-pseudocomplemented if and only if each atom is coprime. Furthermore, these elements naturally decompose lattices into sublattices so that often properties of the original lattice can be deduced from properties of the sublattice. Not every lattice has primes and coprimes. This paper shows that lattices which are “long enough” must have primes and coprimes and that these elements and the resulting decompositions can be used to study such lattices. The length of every finite lattice is bounded above by the minimum of the number of meet-irreducibles (meet-rank) and the number of join-irreducibles (join-rank) that it has. This paper studies lattices for which length=join-rank or length=meet-rank. These are called p-extremal lattices and they have interesting decompositions and properties. For example, ranked, p-extremal lattices are either lower locally distributive (join-rank=length), upper locally distributive (meet-rank=length) or distributive (join-rank=meet-rank=length). In the absence of the Jordan-Dedekind chain condition, p-extremal lattices still have many interesting properties. Of special interest are the lattices that satisfy both equalities. Such lattices are called extremal; this class includes distributive lattices and the associativity lattices of Tamari. Even though they have interesting decompositions, extremal lattices cannot be characterized algebraically since any finite lattice can be embedded as a subinterval into an extremal lattice. This paper shows how prime and coprime elements, and the poset of irreducibles can be used to analyze p-extremal and other types of lattices. The results presented in this paper are used to deduce many key properties of the Tamari lattices. These lattices behave much like distributive lattices even though they violate the Jordan-Dedekind chain condition very strongly having maximal chains that vary in length from N-1 to N(N-1)/2 where N is a parameter used in the construction of these lattices.

Samuel Huang

Papers

Problems of associativity: A simple proof for the lattice property of systems ordered by a semi-associative law