Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite of animals. Until 1988, it was misidentified as Toxoplasma gondii. Since its first recognition in dogs in 1984 and the description of the new genus and species Neospora caninum in 1988, neosporosis has emerged as a serious disease of cattle and dogs worldwide. Abortions and neonatal mortality are a major problem in livestock operations, and neosporosis is a major cause of abortion in cattle. Although antibodies to N. caninum have been reported, the parasite has not been detected in human tissues. Thus, the zoonotic potential is uncertain. This review is focused mainly on the epidemiology and control of neosporosis in cattle, but worldwide seroprevalences of N. caninum in animals and humans are tabulated. The role of wildlife in the life cycle of N. caninum and strategies for the control of neosporosis in cattle are discussed.

/pdf/epidemiology-and-control-of-neosporosis-and-neospora-caninum-3wbu38pknw.pdf

Epidemiology and Control of Neosporosis and Neospora caninum

https://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/bitstream/ri/12610/1/99999999999999999.pdf

What is the global economic impact of Neospora caninum in cattle - the billion dollar question.

Neospora caninum is one of the most important causes of abortion in cows. The occurrence of N. caninum infection in beef and dairy cattle has been reported worldwide, and in most provinces in Canada. The objective of this review is to summarize our current understanding of N. caninum in dairy and beef cattle for Canadian bovine practitioners. The review covers the life cycle of the agent, its mechanisms of transmission, clinical signs, and tests for diagnosing the infection. Data on the prevalence of the infection in Canadian dairy and beef cattle are reviewed and briefly compared with estimates from other parts of the world. Most importantly for Canadian bovine practitioners, the impacts of the infection, risk factors for its occurrence, and methods of control are also discussed. By reviewing the scientific literature on N. caninum from a Canadian perspective, culling decisions based on the interpretation of diagnostic tests are more effectively made in the control of N. caninum-associated disease.

A review of Neospora caninum in dairy and beef cattle--a Canadian perspective.

In the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate, herds were identified that were likely to have a Neospora caninum sero-prevalence > or = 10% by using a bulk milk ELISA. Individual herd data were obtained by a questionnaire. Univariate logistic regression showed that bulk milk positive farms had a significantly higher chance to report an increased abortion rate than negative farms (P(Wald)<0.1). The chance to have a bulk milk positive herd increased with the minimum number of years a farm had reported an increased abortion rate (P(Wald)<0.1). Questionnaire data, population and dog density as well as climatic data specific for the farm localization were used to identify potential risk factors for a herd to have acquired N. caninum infections. Within an optimized multiple logistic regression model 'Number of farm dogs', 'Herd size', and factors related to the municipality the farm was localized, i.e. 'Mean temperature in July', and 'Dog density' were significant risk factors (P(Wald)<0.1). The present study underlines the role farm dogs have in the epidemiology of neosporosis. In addition, it suggests that the risk a herd has to acquire N. caninum infections is also associated with factors related to the farm location, i.e. factors that are largely out of the control of farmers.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0031182004005700

Potential risk factors for bovine Neospora caninum infection in Germany are not under the control of the farmers.

Regional distribution of bovine Neospora caninum infection in the German state of Rhineland-Palatinate modelled by Logistic regression.

Serum samples from 4,907 cows from 93 dairy and five beef herds were analyzed for antibodies to Neospora caninum by commercially available ELISA. The herds were recruited from 20 states and the territory of Puerto Rico. A questionnaire assessed the herd's abortion history and exposure risks to N. caninum. Results showed that 788 (16%) cows tested positive for antibodies to N. caninum. At least one positive animal was detected in 90% of the herds tested. The prevalence of cows seropositive to N. caninum varied from 2% to 65% among herds. Abortion rates ranging from 2% to 19% were reported. The epidemiologic data collected from the questionnaire suggested that the presence of farm dogs does not increase the risk of exposure of cows to N. caninum.

Sandra J Rodgers

Papers

Survey of Neospora caninum antibodies in dairy and beef cattle from five regions of the United States.