Showing papers by "Sanjeev Saksena published in 1985"

Comparative efficacy of transvenous cardioversion and pacing in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.

Abstract: We performed a prospective, randomized crossover study to evaluate the comparative efficacy of transvenous cardioversion and rapid ventricular pacing for termination of induced ventricular tachycardia in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia and organic heart disease. Sixty-two episodes of ventricular tachycardia were induced in 15 patients, mean age 60 +/- 10 years, during electrophysiologic studies. All patients underwent a preselected electrical therapy protocol in a randomized crossover sequence. Transvenous cardioversion was performed by an incremental protocol of three sequential shocks (0.5, 1.1, and 2.7 J). Six asynchronous sequential bursts of rapid ventricular pacing (10 and 15 paced stimuli at 90%, 75%, and 65% of ventricular tachycardia cycle length) were used. Mean cycle length of ventricular tachycardia for the study population was 391 +/- 85 msec. The morphology of the tachycardia was left bundle branch block in 27, right bundle branch block in 32, and indeterminate in three. Characteristics of ventricular tachycardia terminated by the two techniques were comparable. Rate of success for termination of tachycardia with the two methods was also comparable (transvenous cardioversion 83%, rapid ventricular pacing 80%; p greater than .1) and these responses were concordant in 78%. The modes of termination of ventricular tachycardia were similar. The incidence of acceleration of ventricular tachycardia per episode with these preselected protocols was also comparable (transvenous cardioversion 11%, rapid ventricular pacing 6%; p greater than .2). Transient supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were more frequent after transvenous cardioversion (23%) than after rapid ventricular pacing (3%). Significant patient discomfort occurred only after transvenous cardioversion (incidence of 57%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

A prospective randomized study of the clinical efficacy and safety of transvenous cardioversion for termination of ventricular tachycardia.

Abstract: The clinical efficacy and safety of transvenous cardioversion for termination of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) were examined by a prospective randomized study design in 22 patients (19 men, three women; mean age 64 +/- 9 years) with organic heart disease and sustained VT. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo an incremental low-energy protocol from 0.03 to 2.2 J (group A, 11 patients) or an incremental high-energy protocol from 0.5 to 10.0 J (group B, 11 patients). Transvenous cardioversion was performed during electrophysiologic studies in the control (drug-free) state and during serial antiarrhythmic drug testing in all patients. Both groups were comparable for demographic, disease and functional status, and electrophysiologic parameters. A total of 77 episodes of VT (group A, 45; group B, 32) were analyzed. The overall efficacy of transvenous cardioversion for termination of VT was 62% (group A 56% vs group B 72%; p less than .01). Antiarrhythmic drug therapy did not significantly enhance efficacy of transvenous cardioversion (control 59% vs drug 65%; p greater than .2). Stepwise discriminant analysis correlated successful transvenous cardioversion with longer VT cycle length (p less than .0005), higher energy (p less than .025), lower energy waveform tilt (p less than .025), shorter time to initial cardioversion attempt (p less than .025), and shorter QRS duration in sinus rhythm (p less than .05). Acceleration of VT was frequent (8% incidence per delivered shock). Thirty-one percent of all incremental shock protocols were terminated because of this complication. After cardioversion, transient arrhythmias were common (bradyarrhythmias 23%, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias 12%). Displacement of electrode catheters after transvenous cardioversion was uncommon (3%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

NASPE Ad Hoc Committee on Guidelines for Cardiac Electrophysiological Studies. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Abstract: In the following outline we address the diagnostic and therapeutic indications and safety of cardiac electrophysiological stimulation and recording studies (henceforth abbreviated \"EPS\") based on the most current knowledge available. Selected references are provided at the end. These guidelines are flexible and should be considered subject to amendment or addition as more knowledge is gained in this rapidly expanding area. It is suggested that these guidelines be reassessed every one to two years. We have indicated those clinical situations in which we feel EPS are definitely indicated (group A), those clinical situations in which EPS are probably or possibly indicated (group B), and those situations in which EPS are not indicated (group C). Not all headings will include representation from every group. The actual techniques are not detailed, nor are the qualifications of the individuals or the laboratories enumerated; we are assuming, for the purposes of this document, that the studies are performed by competent and knowledgeable people with the appropriate technological and instrumental support.