Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

WRITING GROUP MEMBERS Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, SCM, FAHA Michael J. Blaha, MD, MPH Stephanie E. Chiuve, ScD Mary Cushman, MD, MSc, FAHA Sandeep R. Das, MD, MPH, FAHA Rajat Deo, MD, MTR Sarah D. de Ferranti, MD, MPH James Floyd, MD, MS Myriam Fornage, PhD, FAHA Cathleen Gillespie, MS Carmen R. Isasi, MD, PhD, FAHA Monik C. Jiménez, ScD, SM Lori Chaffin Jordan, MD, PhD Suzanne E. Judd, PhD Daniel Lackland, DrPH, FAHA Judith H. Lichtman, PhD, MPH, FAHA Lynda Lisabeth, PhD, MPH, FAHA Simin Liu, MD, ScD, FAHA Chris T. Longenecker, MD Rachel H. Mackey, PhD, MPH, FAHA Kunihiro Matsushita, MD, PhD, FAHA Dariush Mozaffarian, MD, DrPH, FAHA Michael E. Mussolino, PhD, FAHA Khurram Nasir, MD, MPH, FAHA Robert W. Neumar, MD, PhD, FAHA Latha Palaniappan, MD, MS, FAHA Dilip K. Pandey, MBBS, MS, PhD, FAHA Ravi R. Thiagarajan, MD, MPH Mathew J. Reeves, PhD Matthew Ritchey, PT, DPT, OCS, MPH Carlos J. Rodriguez, MD, MPH, FAHA Gregory A. Roth, MD, MPH Wayne D. Rosamond, PhD, FAHA Comilla Sasson, MD, PhD, FAHA Amytis Towfighi, MD Connie W. Tsao, MD, MPH Melanie B. Turner, MPH Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD, FAHA Jenifer H. Voeks, PhD Joshua Z. Willey, MD, MS John T. Wilkins, MD Jason HY. Wu, MSc, PhD, FAHA Heather M. Alger, PhD Sally S. Wong, PhD, RD, CDN, FAHA Paul Muntner, PhD, MHSc On behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

Author(s): Writing Group Members; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Benjamin, Emelia J; Go, Alan S; Arnett, Donna K; Blaha, Michael J; Cushman, Mary; Das, Sandeep R; de Ferranti, Sarah; Despres, Jean-Pierre; Fullerton, Heather J; Howard, Virginia J; Huffman, Mark D; Isasi, Carmen R; Jimenez, Monik C; Judd, Suzanne E; Kissela, Brett M; Lichtman, Judith H; Lisabeth, Lynda D; Liu, Simin; Mackey, Rachel H; Magid, David J; McGuire, Darren K; Mohler, Emile R; Moy, Claudia S; Muntner, Paul; Mussolino, Michael E; Nasir, Khurram; Neumar, Robert W; Nichol, Graham; Palaniappan, Latha; Pandey, Dilip K; Reeves, Mathew J; Rodriguez, Carlos J; Rosamond, Wayne; Sorlie, Paul D; Stein, Joel; Towfighi, Amytis; Turan, Tanya N; Virani, Salim S; Woo, Daniel; Yeh, Robert W; Turner, Melanie B; American Heart Association Statistics Committee; Stroke Statistics Subcommittee

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

March 5, 2019 e1 WRITING GROUP MEMBERS Emelia J. Benjamin, MD, ScM, FAHA, Chair Paul Muntner, PhD, MHS, FAHA, Vice Chair Alvaro Alonso, MD, PhD, FAHA Marcio S. Bittencourt, MD, PhD, MPH Clifton W. Callaway, MD, FAHA April P. Carson, PhD, MSPH, FAHA Alanna M. Chamberlain, PhD Alexander R. Chang, MD, MS Susan Cheng, MD, MMSc, MPH, FAHA Sandeep R. Das, MD, MPH, MBA, FAHA Francesca N. Delling, MD, MPH Luc Djousse, MD, ScD, MPH Mitchell S.V. Elkind, MD, MS, FAHA Jane F. Ferguson, PhD, FAHA Myriam Fornage, PhD, FAHA Lori Chaffin Jordan, MD, PhD, FAHA Sadiya S. Khan, MD, MSc Brett M. Kissela, MD, MS Kristen L. Knutson, PhD Tak W. Kwan, MD, FAHA Daniel T. Lackland, DrPH, FAHA Tené T. Lewis, PhD Judith H. Lichtman, PhD, MPH, FAHA Chris T. Longenecker, MD Matthew Shane Loop, PhD Pamela L. Lutsey, PhD, MPH, FAHA Seth S. Martin, MD, MHS, FAHA Kunihiro Matsushita, MD, PhD, FAHA Andrew E. Moran, MD, MPH, FAHA Michael E. Mussolino, PhD, FAHA Martin O’Flaherty, MD, MSc, PhD Ambarish Pandey, MD, MSCS Amanda M. Perak, MD, MS Wayne D. Rosamond, PhD, MS, FAHA Gregory A. Roth, MD, MPH, FAHA Uchechukwu K.A. Sampson, MD, MBA, MPH, FAHA Gary M. Satou, MD, FAHA Emily B. Schroeder, MD, PhD, FAHA Svati H. Shah, MD, MHS, FAHA Nicole L. Spartano, PhD Andrew Stokes, PhD David L. Tirschwell, MD, MS, MSc, FAHA Connie W. Tsao, MD, MPH, Vice Chair Elect Mintu P. Turakhia, MD, MAS, FAHA Lisa B. VanWagner, MD, MSc, FAST John T. Wilkins, MD, MS, FAHA Sally S. Wong, PhD, RD, CDN, FAHA Salim S. Virani, MD, PhD, FAHA, Chair Elect On behalf of the American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

Author(s): Go, Alan S; Mozaffarian, Dariush; Roger, Veronique L; Benjamin, Emelia J; Berry, Jarett D; Borden, William B; Bravata, Dawn M; Dai, Shifan; Ford, Earl S; Fox, Caroline S; Franco, Sheila; Fullerton, Heather J; Gillespie, Cathleen; Hailpern, Susan M; Heit, John A; Howard, Virginia J; Huffman, Mark D; Kissela, Brett M; Kittner, Steven J; Lackland, Daniel T; Lichtman, Judith H; Lisabeth, Lynda D; Magid, David; Marcus, Gregory M; Marelli, Ariane; Matchar, David B; McGuire, Darren K; Mohler, Emile R; Moy, Claudia S; Mussolino, Michael E; Nichol, Graham; Paynter, Nina P; Schreiner, Pamela J; Sorlie, Paul D; Stein, Joel; Turan, Tanya N; Virani, Salim S; Wong, Nathan D; Woo, Daniel; Turner, Melanie B; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2013 Update A Report From the American Heart Association

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) devices were originally developed for prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). They are now widely regarded as the primary therapy for this condition. Clinical trials have led to a progressive expansion in indications for their use.1,2⇓ Recent clinical reports show effectiveness of these devices in patients with recurrent syncope, in the prevention of SCD in high-risk patients with coronary disease, and in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Refinements in ICD technology have improved functionality and enhanced safety. Optimal patient management requires intimate knowledge of these complex devices and of the diverse arrhythmias that may be treatable by a single multifaceted ICD device.

A 75-year-old man presented with near-syncope and ventricular arrhythmias. He had a past history of dilated cardiomyopathy, old cerebrovascular accident, symptomatic atrial flutter/fibrillation, and heart failure. He had been treated with anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic drugs, but it was noted on admission that he was in atrial flutter with a ventricular rate of 110 bpm. Electrophysiological evaluation revealed isthmus- (common or typical) and nonisthmus- (atypical) dependent atrial flutter and inducible hypotensive monomorphic sustained ventricular tachycardia. A linear ablation of the tricuspid valve-inferior vena cava isthmus interrupted common flutter, but atypical flutter persisted. The following day, a dual chamber ICD capable of defibrillation and antitachycardia, as well as standard demand pacing in both chambers, was inserted. An additional coronary sinus lead was placed to permit dual site right atrial pacing for prevention of atrial flutter and fibrillation (Figure 1A). The patient was given a handheld activator for termination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter. 



Figure 1. A, Lateral radiograph of the chest showing the first dual chamber atrioventricular defibrillator inserted in patient with refractory atrial fibrillation. Note the distinct atrial and ventricular pacing and defibrillation leads. An additional coronary sinus pacing lead is placed …

Management of the patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in the third millennium.

Management of atrial fibrillation: two decades of progress — a scientific statement from the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society

A comprehensive presentation of electrical therapy by more than 40 highly respected authorities, including complete coverage of tachycardia (fast rate) therapy, as well as bradycardias (conventional cardiac pacing). This valuable text also details concepts of arrhythmia prevention or ablation with electrical techniques...device implantation techniques* electrocardiographic, radiologic, and device monitoring techniques, much more.

Electrical therapy for cardiac arrhythmias : pacing, antitachycardia devices, catheter ablation

Implantable defibrillators in the third millennium: increasingly relegated to a standby role?

Novel pacing modes are being proposed for the prevention or reversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). High right atrial (RA) pacing and septal pacing have not individually reduced arrhythmic events in patients with AF in controlled trials. The DAPPAF trial compared the effectiveness of overdrive high right atrial single and dual site right atrial pacing as compared to demand pacing in prevention of recurrent symptomatic AF in patients with AF & bradyarrhythmias. Methods: From September 1996 to November 2000, 120 patients with documented symptomatic AF were enrolled and followed in a prospective randomized single blind crossover multicenter trial. 73 males & 45 females, mean age 66 ± 11 yrs with recurrent symptomatic AF (paroxysmal in 82 pts, persistent >72 hrs in 30 pts & persistent >30 days in 6 pts) were enrolled. Baseline AF event frequency was ≥1/day in 40 pts, 1/week in 43 pts, <1/week in 30 pts, & unknown in 5 pts. Patients were implanted with dual site right atrial pacing systems and randomly assigned to six-month treatment periods in overdrive dual, overdrive single or demand pacing. Three primary endpoints (time to first AF recurrence, patient quality of life & tolerance/safety) and several secondary endpoints (device detected sustained AF, atrial & ventricular function indices, & composite endpoints) were examined. Results: Only DAP was significantly effective in preventing recurrent AF and prolonging time to first symptomatic AF recurrence in the presence of class 1 & 3 antiarrhythmic drug therapy; it was more effective than H.A. pacing in reducing asymptomatic AF event frequency; DAY alone prevented left ventricular and left atrial dilatation seen with D'ETRE pacing in this population due to improved left atrial transport; in patients with persistent AF or after Sawtell therapy, DAY maintained efficacy while H.A. pacing showed attrition in effectiveness. DAY was better tolerated than H.A. pacing, with fewer crossovers and comparable safety to H.A. pacing. Conclusions: DAY is an important therapeutic tool in an “hybrid” strategy for management of drug-refractory AF. It offers antiarrhythmic and hemodynamic benefits and can have therapeutic effects on symptomatic and asymptomatic paroxysmal and persistent AF. It can facilitate efficacy of other antiarrhythmic therapies in AF. Further study of its antiarrhythmic effects with hybrid drug and ablation therapies is now in progress, and long-term use in an “hybrid” strategy has been reported in large pilot studies.

The Role of Multisite Atrial Pacing in Rhythm Control in AF: Insights from Sub-analyses of the Dual Site Atrial Pacing for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Study

Sanjeev Saksena

Papers

Management of the patient with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in the third millennium.

Management of atrial fibrillation: two decades of progress — a scientific statement from the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society

Electrical therapy for cardiac arrhythmias : pacing, antitachycardia devices, catheter ablation

Implantable defibrillators in the third millennium: increasingly relegated to a standby role?

The Role of Multisite Atrial Pacing in Rhythm Control in AF: Insights from Sub-analyses of the Dual Site Atrial Pacing for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Study