S
Sarah L. Woulfin
Researcher at University of Connecticut
Publications - 38
Citations - 909
Sarah L. Woulfin is an academic researcher from University of Connecticut. The author has contributed to research in topics: Coaching & Reading (process). The author has an hindex of 16, co-authored 34 publications receiving 693 citations. Previous affiliations of Sarah L. Woulfin include University of California, Berkeley.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Reading Coaches and the Relationship Between Policy and Practice
TL;DR: This paper investigated the role of reading coaches in mediating the relationship between reading first policy and teachers' classroom practice and found that teachers were much more likely to make substantial changes in their classroom practice when they learned about the policy message from a coach than from other sources.
Journal ArticleDOI
From Tinkering to Going "Rogue": How Principals Use Agency When Enacting New Teacher Evaluation Systems.
TL;DR: Despite major changes to teacher evaluation since 2009, scant research examines how principals enact these policies as discussed by the authors, drawing on qualitative interviews with 44 principals in 13 Connecticut districts, they examined how principals act on these changes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Coaching for Coherence: How Instructional Coaches Lead Change in the Evaluation Era:
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that coaching can be aligned with teacher evaluation systems to work toward the same goal, and argue that it can be used as an instrument for capacity building.
Journal ArticleDOI
District Leaders' Framing of Educator Evaluation Policy.
TL;DR: In this article, the evaluation systems have recently undergone scrutiny and reform, and district and school leaders play a key role in interpreting and enacting these evaluation systems, and this article uses frami...
Journal ArticleDOI
Equity-Oriented Reform Amid Standards-Based Accountability: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of an Intermediary’s Instructional Practices
TL;DR: This paper investigated one intermediary that marketed equity-oriented instructional goals for schools serving high numbers of students of color and English Learners, analyzing its behavior amid a high-stakes accountability environment, its reasons for adopting certain reforms, and the consequences for instruction.