scispace - formally typeset
S

Scott Eacott

Researcher at University of New South Wales

Publications -  109
Citations -  1042

Scott Eacott is an academic researcher from University of New South Wales. The author has contributed to research in topics: Educational leadership & Scholarship. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 99 publications receiving 902 citations. Previous affiliations of Scott Eacott include University of Newcastle & Australian Catholic University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preparing 'educational' leaders in managerialist times :an Australian story

TL;DR: The authors argue that the doxa of school leadership establishes a particular identity of the principalship, one which constructs the principal as the deliverer of state initiated reforms, and argue for an alternate way of thinking about leadership preparation, one based on introducing participants to the conversation of the world.
Journal ArticleDOI

School Leadership Preparation and Development in Africa A Critical Insight

TL;DR: The authors argue that the ontological complicity of policy interventions, particularly those funded by the global north, is shaping African developments in a manner that is exclusive of localized knowledge, values and histories.
Journal ArticleDOI

School leadership and the cult of the guru: the neo-Taylorism of Hattie

TL;DR: As one of the central institutions of society, schooling is subject to significant public interest and scrutiny Fads and fashion successfully developed elsewhere are often rebadged and relaunched as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategy in educational leadership: in search of unity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine knowledge of strategy within the field of educational administration and identify key conceptual and methodological issues in current research, and suggest alternate ways of defining and researching strategy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bourdieu’s Strategies and the challenge for educational leadership

TL;DR: This paper argued that insufficient attention has been devoted to the temporal features of leadership actions and pointed out that the resulting lists of traits, behaviours and organizational structures provide little in furthering our understanding of leadership.