scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Sharmila Majumdar published in 1995"


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 1995-Bone
TL;DR: The results indicate that MR may be used to visualize and quantify trabecular bone architecture; however, the different technical factors that could affect the appearance of MR images must be understood and considered in the data analysis and interpretation.

197 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: New techniques for assessing osteoporosis and predicting fracture risk are reviewed in this paper, including studies aimed at quantifying marrow relaxation times and establishing their relationship to trabecular bone density and structure.
Abstract: Osteoporosis is a common metabolic disorder with considerable associated morbidity and mortality. The loss of bone mineral integrity and the resultant occurrence of atraumatic fractures are typically symptomatic of the disease. Currently skeletal status is commonly assessed using non-invasive conventional radiography and scintigraphy as well as densitometric techniques such as quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. But, apart from gross bone mineral density, the fine structure of trabecular bone also plays an important role in defining the biomechanical competence of the skeleton. Recently attention has been focused on deriving measures that provide information about not only trabecular bone density but also microstructure. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one such new technique which potentially may provide information pertaining to bone density and structure as well as to occult fracture detection. Cortical bone produces a signal void in MR images, due to the fact that it contains very few mobile protons that give rise to a signal in MRI; also the MR relaxation time T2 of these protons is very short which produces a very fast decay of the MR signal during image acquisition. However, the trabecular bone network affects the MR properties of bone marrow. The difference in the magnetic properties of trabecular bone and bone marrow generates local imperfections in the magnetic field. The MR signal from bone marrow is modified due to these imperfections and the MR relaxation time T2* of marrow is shortened. The extent of relaxation time shortening and hence loss of signal intensity is proportional to the density of trabecular bone and marrow interfaces and their spatial architecture. Recent investigation in this area include studies aimed at quantifying marrow relaxation times and establishing their relationship to trabecular bone density and structure. In addition, with advances in imaging software and hardware, MR images at in-plane resolutions of 78–200 µm may be obtained. The trabecular bone structure is clearly revealed in such images and studies aimed at the development of high-resolution MRI techniques combined with quantitative image analysis techniques are currently under way. These potentially useful techniques for assessing osteoporosis and predicting fracture risk are reviewed in this paper.

89 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The intent of this review is to discuss the pros and cons of these techniques and to present the new applications of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MRI) in the detection and management of osteoporosis.
Abstract: Bone mass is the primary, although not the only, determinant of fracture. Over the past few years a number of noninvasive techniques have been developed to more sensitively quantitate bone mass. These include single and dual photon absorptiometry (SPA and DPA), single and dual X-ray absorptiometry (SXA and DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). While differing in anatomic sites measured and in their estimates of precision, accuracy, and fracture discrimination, all of these methods provide clinically useful measurements of skeletal status. It is the intent of this review to discuss the pros and cons of these techniques and to present the new applications of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MRI) in the detection and management of osteoporosis.

43 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results indicate a moderate significant negative correlation between T2* and ash density or elastic modulus (E) in both sets of specimens and trabecular bone properties may potentially be assessed with quantitative MR techniques.
Abstract: Objective It has been hypothesized that the MR relaxation time T2* of bone marrow present in the intertrabecular spaces may be related to the density of the trabecular network and may be a predictor of trabecular bone properties. Materials and methods To derive a relationship between the marrow relaxation time T2* and biomechanical properties of trabecular bone, we studied two sets of trabecular bone specimens from human tibiae. The first set consisted of 12 specimens that were defatted and immersed in saline; the second set consisted of 18 specimens with marrow in the trabecular spaces. The MR studies were conducted on a 1.5 T imaging system. In the first set of specimens, a GE sequence (TR = 70 ms; TE = 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 ms) was used to obtain images in the axial plane. In the second set, a water suppression pulse was used prior to an asymmetric SE sequence (TR = 300 ms; TE = 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 ms) to obtain images in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes. The T2* of the intertrabecular saline of the marrow fat was calculated assuming a monoexponential decay. In both sets, the elastic moduli were measured in three orthogonal directions (superoinferior, anteroposterior, and mediolateral). The ash density was determined after the completion of the experiments. Results Our results indicate a moderate significant negative correlation between T2* and ash density or elastic modulus (E) in both sets of specimens. The correlation coefficients were slightly improved between the transverse relaxation rate 1/T2* and bone density or E. We found a good correlation between T2* and the reciprocal ash density (r = 0.88) and between T2* and the reciprocal elastic modulus 1/E (r = 0.87 to r = 0.95) in the first set, while in the second set the correlation remained moderate. With use of a multiple linear regression model (1/E = a x T2* + b x 1/T2* + n), the reciprocal elastic moduli 1/E were predicted to > 90% by T2* and 1/T2* in the first set of specimens. This finding was not replicated with the second set of specimens. In the second set of specimens, we found poor to moderate correlation coefficients between the T2* times in the three orthogonal planes (r = 0.45 to r = 0.71). Conclusion Trabecular bone properties such as density and strength may potentially be assessed with quantitative MR techniques. However, especially for in vitro studies, specimen preparation, acquisition parameters, and specimen geometry may have a significant impact on the obtained results.

40 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This MR technique for quantitative assessment of trabecular bone density showed reasonable reproducibility in vivo and is a promising future tool for the assessment of osteoporosis.
Abstract: The effective transverse relaxation time T2* is influenced by the presence of trabecular bone, and can potentially provide a measure of bone density as well as bone structure. We determined the in vivo precision of T2* in repeated bone marrow measurements. The T2* measurements of the bone marrow of the distal radius were performed twice within 2 weeks in six healthy young volunteers using a modified water-presaturated 3D Gradient-Recalled Acquisition at Steady State (GRASS) sequence with TE 7, 10, 12, 20, and 30; TR 67; flip angle (FA) 90 degrees. An axial volume covering a length of 5.6 cm in the distal radius was measured. Regions of interest (ROIs) were determined manually and consisted of the entire trabecular bone cross-section extending proximally from the radial subchondral endplate. Reproducibility of T2* and area measurements was expressed as the absolute precision error (standard deviation [SD] in ms or mm2) or as the relative precision error (SD/mean x 100, or coefficient of variation [CV] in %) between the two-point measurements. Short-term precision of T2* and area measurements varied depending on section thickness and location of the ROI in the distal radius. Absolute precision errors for T2* times were between 1.3 and 2.9 ms (relative precision errors 3.8-9.5 %) and for area measurements between 20 and 55 mm2 (relative precision errors 5.1-16.4%). This MR technique for quantitative assessment of trabecular bone density showed reasonable reproducibility in vivo and is a promising future tool for the assessment of osteoporosis.

24 citations