S
Shelly S Hinck
Researcher at Central Michigan University
Publications - 25
Citations - 489
Shelly S Hinck is an academic researcher from Central Michigan University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Service-learning & Politeness theory. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 23 publications receiving 451 citations. Previous affiliations of Shelly S Hinck include University of Kansas & Carnegie Mellon University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Rape Myth Acceptance in College Students: How Far Have We Come?
Shelly S Hinck,Richard W. Thomas +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the current state of acceptance of rape myths acceptance in college students and the factors which differentiated acceptance vs nonacceptance of the rape myths and found that college students reported disagreement with rape myth statements.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Relationship between Institutional Support and Campus Acceptance of Academic Service Learning
TL;DR: In this article, a survey was sent to 225 randomly selected colleges and universities with membership in their state campus compact organization to understand how institutions are currently facilitating the service-learning movement.
Journal Article
Evidences of Transformative Learning in Service-Learning Reflections
TL;DR: In this article, a phenomenological study examined student reflective writings from an Honors service-learning course at a medium-sized midwestern university for evidences of transformative learning, the precipitating disequilibria, and the significant pedagogical structures underlying growth.
Journal ArticleDOI
Service Learning: Connecting Citizenship with the Classroom
TL;DR: Service learning is the blending of service and learning goals in such a way that the two reinforce one another as mentioned in this paper, which connects student service with traditional classroom instruction, learning, and reflection.
Service Learning: Connecting Citizenship with the Classroom
TL;DR: Service learning is the blending of service and learning goals in such a way that the two reinforce one another as discussed by the authors, which connects student service with traditional classroom instruction, learning, and reflection.