https://www.ipd.gu.se/digitalAssets/1252/1252566_Artikel_sept_Aina_Lancet_2_.pdf

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Study design Systematic review and modified Delphi technique. Objective To use an evidence-based medicine process using the best available literature and expert opinion consensus to develop a comprehensive classification system to diagnose neoplastic spinal instability. Summary of background data Spinal instability is poorly defined in the literature and presently there is a lack of guidelines available to aid in defining the degree of spinal instability in the setting of neoplastic spinal disease. The concept of spinal instability remains important in the clinical decision-making process for patients with spine tumors. Methods We have integrated the evidence provided by systematic reviews through a modified Delphi technique to generate a consensus of best evidence and expert opinion to develop a classification system to define neoplastic spinal instability. Results A comprehensive classification system based on patient symptoms and radiographic criteria of the spine was developed to aid in predicting spine stability of neoplastic lesions. The classification system includes global spinal location of the tumor, type and presence of pain, bone lesion quality, spinal alignment, extent of vertebral body collapse, and posterolateral spinal element involvement. Qualitative scores were assigned based on relative importance of particular factors gleaned from the literature and refined by expert consensus. Conclusion The Spine Instability Neoplastic Score is a comprehensive classification system with content validity that can guide clinicians in identifying when patients with neoplastic disease of the spine may benefit from surgical consultation. It can also aid surgeons in assessing the key components of spinal instability due to neoplasia and may become a prognostic tool for surgical decision-making when put in context with other key elements such as neurologic symptoms, extent of disease, prognosis, patient health factors, oncologic subtype, and radiosensitivity of the tumor.

A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group.

A new method for the treatment of scoliosis is described in which a metal system of rods and hooks is implanted, and distraction and compression forces applied, to correct the curve and stabilize the treated segments in the corrected position by skeletal fixation. The technique and principles of this method of treatment and a summary of the preliminary results are given.

JBJS classics: Treatment of scoliosis: Correction and internal fixation by spine instrumentation

Disclosed are prosthetic devices for insertion into intervertebral disc spaces after the removal of an intervertebral disc or after a corpectomy. Specifically, intervertebral devices having fixed shapes for accommodating the defined surface contours of vertebral endplates are disclosed. Also disclosed are intervertebral devices formed of osteoinductive materials, such as bone growth factors, to facilitate bone growth. A method for quantitatively determining the three-dimensional morphology of vertebral surfaces, particularly vertebral endplates, is also disclosed.

Prosthetic intervertebral devices

Objectives. —To determine success and complication rates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery, predictors of good outcomes, and whether fusion improves success rates of laminectomy for specific low back disorders. Data Sources. —English-language journal articles published from 1966 through April 1991, identified through MEDLINE searching ( spinalfusion plus limiting terms), bibliography review, and expert consultation. Study Selection. —Articles were selected only if they reported at least 1 year of follow-up data enabling the classification of clinical outcomes as satisfactory or unsatisfactory for at least 30 patients. Data Extraction. —Two reviewers independently extracted data on patient characteristics, surgical methods, patient outcomes, and quality of study methods. Data Synthesis. —Of 47 articles, there were no randomized trials. Four nonrandomized studies compared surgery with and without fusion for herniated disks; three found no advantage for fusion. On average, 68% of patients had a satisfactory outcome after fusion, but the range was wide (16% to 95%), and the satisfactory outcome rate was lower in prospective than in retrospective studies. The most frequently reported complications were pseudarthrosis (14%) and chronic pain at the bone graft donor site (9%). Clinical outcomes did not differ by diagnosis or fusion technique, but were worse in studies with a greater number of previously operated patients. Conclusions. —For several low back disorders no advantage has been demonstrated for fusion over surgery without fusion, and complications of fusions are common. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare fusion, surgery without fusion, and nonsurgical treatments in rigorously defined patient groups. ( JAMA . 1992;268:907-911)

Patient Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusions

One hundred and fifty consecutive patients who had a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine and associated neurological deficits were managed with a single-stage anterior spinal decompression, strut-grafting, and Kaneda spinal instrumentation. At a mean of eight years (range, five years to twelve years and eleven months) after the operation, radiographs showed successful fusion of the injured spinal segment in 140 patients (93 per cent). Ten patients had a pseudarthrosis, and all were managed successfully with posterior spinal instrumentation and a posterolateral arthrodesis. The percentage of the canal that was obstructed, as measured on computed tomography, improved from a preoperative mean of 47 per cent (range, 24 to 92 per cent) to a postoperative mean of 2 per cent (range, 0 to 8 per cent). Despite breakage of the Kaneda device in nine patients, removal of the implant was not necessary in any patient. None of the patients had iatrogenic neurological deficits. After the anterior decompression, the neurological function of 142 (95 per cent) of the 150 patients improved by at least one grade, as measured with a modification of the grading scale of Frankel et al. Fifty-six (72 per cent) of the seventy-eight patients who had preoperative paralysis or dysfunction of the bladder recovered completely. One hundred and twenty-five (96 per cent) of the 130 patients who were employed before the injury returned to work after the operation, and 112 (86 per cent) of them returned to their previous job without restrictions. We concluded that anterior decompression, strut- grafting, and fixation with the Kaneda device in patients who had a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar spine and associated neurological deficits yielded good radiographic and functional results.

Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits.

Study design The associations between vertebral body collapse and the size or location of the metastatic lesions were analyzed statistically to estimate the critical point of collapse. Objectives To determine risk factors for collapse, to estimate the predicted probability of collapse under various states of metastatic vertebral involvement, and to establish the criteria of impending collapse. Summary of background data Pathologic vertebral collapse brings about severe pain and paralysis in patients with cancer. Prevention of collapse plays a significant role in maintaining or improving their quality of life. Because no previous study has clarified the critical point of vertebral collapse, however, the optimum timing for prophylactic treatment has been unclear. Methods The size and location of metastatic tumor from Th1 to L5 were evaluated radiologically for 100 thoracic and lumbar vertebrae with osteolytic lesions. The correlations between collapse and the following risk factors (x1-x4) were determined by means of a multivariate logistic regression model: x1, tumor size (the percentage of tumor occupancy in the vertebral body [% TO]); x2, pedicle destruction, x3, posterior element destruction; and x4, costovertebral joint destruction. Results Significant risk factors were costovertebral joint destruction (odds ratio, 10.17; P = 0.021) and tumor size (odds ratio of every 10% increment in %TO, 2.44; P = 0.032) in the thoracic region (Th1-Th10), whereas, tumor size (odds ratio of every 10% increment in %TO, 4.35; P = 0.002) and pedicle destruction (odds ratio, 297.08; P = 0.009) were main factors in the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine (Th10-L5). The criteria of impending collapse were: 50-60% involvement of the vertebral body with no destruction of other structures, or 25-30% involvement with costovertebral joint destruction in the thoracic spine; and 35-40% involvement of vertebral body, or 20-25% involvement with posterior elements destruction in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine. Conclusions With respect to the timing and occurrence of vertebral collapse, there is a distinct discrepancy between the thoracic and thoracolumbar or lumbar spine. When a prophylactic treatment is required, the optimum timing and method of treatment should be selected according to the level and extent of the metastatic vertebral involvement.

Risk factors and probability of vertebral body collapse in metastases of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Twenty-two patients with neurologic deficit due to delayed posttraumatic vertebral collapse after osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracolumbar spine underwent anterior decompression and reconstruction with bioactive Apatite-Wollastonite containing glass ceramic vertebral prosthesis and Kaneda instrumentation. Eighteen patients previously had minor trauma that resulted in a mild vertebral compression fracture without any neurologic involvement and were either conservatively treated or not treated at all. Four had no history of back injury. The preoperative neurologic status was incomplete paralysis in all patients. The average age at surgery was 66 (53-79) years. The average follow-up was 34 (20-58) months after surgery. All patients had returned to their daily living with neurologic recovery and stable spine. This type of anterior procedure is effective in the osteoporotic patients and there was a very low incidence of instrumentation failure and very low morbidity.

The treatment of osteoporotic posttraumatic vertebral collapse using the kaneda device and a bioactive ceramic vertebral prosthesis

Study Design. The Kaneda multisegmental instrumentation is a new anterior two-rod system for the correction of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine deformities. This system consists of a vertebral plate and two vertebral screws for individual vertebral bodies and two semirigid rods to interconnect the vertebral screws. Clinical results of 25 thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis patients treated with this new instrumentation were analyzed. Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of the new anterior instrumentation in correction and stabilization of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Summary of Background Data. Since Dwyer first introduced the concept of anterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for scoliosis, anterior surgery has gradually gained acceptance. In 1976, a useful modification for the anterior spinal instrumentation, which reportedly provided means of lordosation and vertebral body derotation, was described. However, some authors reported a high tendency of the implant breakage, loss of correction, progression of the kyphosis, and pseudoarthrosis as the major complications. To overcome the disadvantages of Zielke instrumentation, the authors have developed a new anterior spinal instrumentation (two-rod system) for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Methods. Anterior correction and fusion using kaneda multisegmental instrumentation was performed in 25 patients with thoracolumbar or lumbar scoliosis. The average follow-up period was 3 years, 1 month (range, 2 years to 4 years, 7 months). There were 20 patients with idiopathic scoliosis (13 adolescents and seven adults) and five patients with other types of scoliosis, including congenital and other etiologies. All patients had correction of scoliosis by fusion within the major curve, and for 16 of the 25 patients, the most distal end vertebra was not included in the fusion (short fusion). Radiographic evaluations were performed to analyze frontal and sagittal alignments of the spine. Results. The average correction rate of scoliosis was 83%. Over the instrumented levels, the correction rate was 90%. Preoperative kyphosis of the instrumented levels of 7° was corrected to 9° of lordosis. Sagittal lordosis of the lumbosacral area beneath the fused segments averaged 51° before surgery and was reduced to 34° after surgery. The trunk shift was improved from 25 mm before surgery to 4 mm at final follow-up evaluation. The average improvement in the lower end vertebra tilt-angle was 97% in those patients whose lower end vertebra was included in the fusion and 83% in patients whose lower end vertebra was not included in the fusion. Apical vertebral rotation showed an average correction rate of 86%. At final follow-up evaluation, all patients demostrated solid fusion without implant-related complications. There was 1.5° of frontal plane and 1.5° of sagittal plane correction loss within the instrumented area at final follow-up evaluation. Conclusions. New anterior two-rod system showed excellent correction of the frontal curvature and sagittal alignment with extremely high correction capability of rotational deformities. Furthermore, correction, of thoracolumbar kyphosis to physiologic lordosis was achieved. This system provides flexibility of the implant for smooth application to the deformed spine and overall rigidity to correct the deformity and maintain the fixation without a significant loss of correction or implant failure compared with conventional one-rod instrumentation systems in anterior scoliosis correction.

New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system.

STUDY DESIGN Analysis of the clinical results of 20 patients with thoracic scoliosis treated by anterior procedure with Kaneda anterior spinal system. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of the anterior surgical correction procedure with a new anterior instrumentation in thoracic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Posterior correction and fusion with posterior instrumentation has been a main component of the surgical management of thoracic scoliosis. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no clinical results of anterior instrumentation surgery for thoracic scoliosis have been published in the English literature. METHODS Anterior correction and fusion using Kaneda anterior spinal system was performed in 20 patients with thoracic scoliosis (3 patients with King Type II curve, 13 with Type III, and 4 with Type IV). The average follow-up was 3 years, with a range of 2 years, 3 months to 4 years, 1 month. There were 1B patients with idiopathic scoliosis (13 adolescents and 5 adults) and 2 patients with a single thoracic curve caused by other etiologies. All patients had correction of scoliosis by fusion within the major thoracic curve. Radiographic evaluations were performed to analyze frontal, sagittal, and rotational deformities of the spine. RESULTS The average correction rate of scoliosis was 71%. Above the instrumented levels, the correction rate was 75%. Preoperative kyphosis of the instrumented levels of 7 degrees was corrected to 14 degrees of kyphosis. The trunk shift was improved from 17 mm before surgery to 9 mm at final follow-up evaluation. The average improvement of the tilt-angle in the lower and vertebra of fusion was 81%, and was 83% in the stable vertebra. Apical vertebral rotation showed correction rate of 15% in patients without performing resection of the rib head joints and rod rotation maneuver (n = 6). However, the correction rate was improved to 58% after introduction of the technique discussed (n = 14). The angle of tangential rib deformity (rib hump) showed a correction rate of 50%. There was 1.2 degrees of frontal plane and 1.0 degree of sagittal plane correction loss within the instrumented area at final follow-up evaluation. At final follow-up, nonunion at the uppermost segment of the fusion range developed in one patient, and decompensation in the lumbar spine was observed in one patient with Type II curve. CONCLUSIONS Anterior correction with Kaneda anterior spinal system provides excellent correction of the frontal curvature and sagittal alignment by fusing within the range of the major curve, without a significant loss of correction and implant failure. Rigid rotational deformity of the thoracic scoliosis is effectively corrected by resection of the rib head joints and rod rotation maneuver. However, too much correction of the thoracic curve should be avoided, to prevent decompensation of the lumbar curve, especially in Type II curves.

Shigenobu Satoh

Papers

Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits.

Risk factors and probability of vertebral body collapse in metastases of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

The treatment of osteoporotic posttraumatic vertebral collapse using the kaneda device and a bioactive ceramic vertebral prosthesis

New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system.

Anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis with Kaneda anterior spinal system. A preliminary report.