Thank you for downloading using multivariate statistics. As you may know, people have look hundreds times for their favorite novels like this using multivariate statistics, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than reading a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they juggled with some harmful bugs inside their laptop. using multivariate statistics is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can download it instantly. Our books collection saves in multiple locations, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the using multivariate statistics is universally compatible with any devices to read.

Using Multivariate Statistics

Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques

Following the 2016 U.S. presidential election, many have expressed concern about the effects of false stories (“fake news”), circulated largely through social media. We discuss the economics of fake news and present new data on its consumption prior to the election. Drawing on web browsing data, archives of fact-checking websites, and results from a new online survey, we find: (i) social media was an important but not dominant source of election news, with 14 percent of Americans calling social media their “most important” source; (ii) of the known false news stories that appeared in the three months before the election, those favoring Trump were shared a total of 30 million times on Facebook, while those favoring Clinton were shared 8 million times; (iii) the average American adult saw on the order of one or perhaps several fake news stories in the months around the election, with just over half of those who recalled seeing them believing them; and (iv) people are much more likely to believe stories that favor their preferred candidate, especially if they have ideologically segregated social media networks.

/pdf/social-media-and-fake-news-in-the-2016-election-1m4ttkb5mo.pdf

Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

Emotion and Adaptation

Originally published in Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 1994, Vol 39(2), 225. Reviews the book, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion by John Zaller (1992). The author's commendable effort to specify a model of mass opinion formation offers readers an introduction to the prevailing vi

The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.

While a fast-growing body of research is concerned with the detrimental consequences of disinformation for democracy, the role of visuals in this context has so far only been discussed superficially. Visuals are expected to amplify the impact of disinformation, but it is rarely specified how, and what exactly distinguishes them from text. This article is one of the first to treat visual disinformation as its own type of falsehood, arguing that it differs from textual disinformation in its production, processing and effects. We suggest that visual disinformation is determined by varying levels of modal richness and manipulative sophistication. Because manipulated visuals are processed differently on a psychological level, they have unique effects on citizens’ behaviours and attitudes.

Visual disinformation in a digital age: A literature synthesis and research agenda

Consumption of misinformation and disinformation

In this chapter is evaluated how journalists today select online sources for their stories, how they interpret the validity of different online tools and sources, and how they evaluate the possibilities of verifying these when producing quality news. The chapter’s second section presents a short case study on how journalists in the Netherlands select and verify sources online.

The Use and Verification of Online Sources in the News Production Process

A growing body of research examines the moderators of political news framing effects. However, so far, moderators have been described as cognitive, with a strong focus on the moderating function of political knowledge. Recently, a number of scholars have suggested that framing effects might also depend on affective variables. However, to date, the role of specific affective variables in moderating framing effects has not been fully determined in political communication research. This study tests mood as one key moderator of political news framing effects on opinion. By means of an experimental survey design (n = 179), we can show that participants in a bad mood are more susceptible to news framing effects than those in a good mood. Implications for framing effects theory and political communication are discussed.

Happy Go Lucky: Mood as a Moderator of Political News Framing Effects

The complex interplays between processes of migration and refuge seeking, public perceptions of migrant religion and religious practices, and political radicalization toward the far right have take...

Sophie Lecheler

Papers

Visual disinformation in a digital age: A literature synthesis and research agenda

Consumption of misinformation and disinformation

The Use and Verification of Online Sources in the News Production Process

Happy Go Lucky: Mood as a Moderator of Political News Framing Effects

Refugees, Media, and Public Opinion: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives