Stacey Langfitt Hendrickson

TL;DR: A literature review was conducted, reviewing past benchmarking studies in the areas of psychology and risk assessment, and a number of lessons learned is presented in order to aid in the design of future HRA benchmarking endeavors.

TL;DR: This document provides a methodology and guidance for conducting a fire HRA, which includes identification and definition of post-fire human failure events, qualitative analysis, quantification, recovery, dependency, and uncertainty, and three approaches to quantification: screening, scoping, and detailed HRA.

TL;DR: The data indicate that work-relevant challenges are better solved by aggregating electronic individual responses rather than by electronically convening a group, and large nominal groups may be more appropriate corporate problem-solving vehicles.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a draft of the method's middle layer, a part of the qualitative analysis phase that links failure mechanisms to performance shaping factors, and identify potential failure mechanisms using the mid-layer model.