Nociceptor inputs can trigger a prolonged but reversible increase in the excitability and synaptic efficacy of neurons in central nociceptive pathways, the phenomenon of central sensitization. Central sensitization manifests as pain hypersensitivity, particularly dynamic tactile allodynia, secondary punctate or pressure hyperalgesia, aftersensations, and enhanced temporal summation. It can be readily and rapidly elicited in human volunteers by diverse experimental noxious conditioning stimuli to skin, muscles or viscera, and in addition to producing pain hypersensitivity, results in secondary changes in brain activity that can be detected by electrophysiological or imaging techniques. Studies in clinical cohorts reveal changes in pain sensitivity that have been interpreted as revealing an important contribution of central sensitization to the pain phenotype in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, musculoskeletal disorders with generalized pain hypersensitivity, headache, temporomandibular joint disorders, dental pain, neuropathic pain, visceral pain hypersensitivity disorders and post-surgical pain. The comorbidity of those pain hypersensitivity syndromes that present in the absence of inflammation or a neural lesion, their similar pattern of clinical presentation and response to centrally acting analgesics, may reflect a commonality of central sensitization to their pathophysiology. An important question that still needs to be determined is whether there are individuals with a higher inherited propensity for developing central sensitization than others, and if so, whether this conveys an increased risk in both developing conditions with pain hypersensitivity, and their chronification. Diagnostic criteria to establish the presence of central sensitization in patients will greatly assist the phenotyping of patients for choosing treatments that produce analgesia by normalizing hyperexcitable central neural activity. We have certainly come a long way since the first discovery of activity-dependent synaptic plasticity in the spinal cord and the revelation that it occurs and produces pain hypersensitivity in patients. Nevertheless, discovering the genetic and environmental contributors to and objective biomarkers of central sensitization will be highly beneficial, as will additional treatment options to prevent or reduce this prevalent and promiscuous form of pain plasticity.

/pdf/central-sensitization-implications-for-the-diagnosis-and-18p4x3px9q.pdf

Central sensitization: implications for the diagnosis and treatment of pain.

OBJECTIVE: Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) has been reported to have analgesic effects independent of its action on muscle tone, possibly by acting on neurogenic inflammation. Such a mechanism may be involved in peripheral neuropathic pain. METHODS: A possible direct analgesic effect of BTX-A pain processing was investigated in 29 patients with focal painful neuropathies and mechanical allodynia using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Patients received a one-time intradermal administration of BTX-A (20-190 units) into the painful area. Outcome measures, evaluated at baseline, then at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, included average spontaneous pain intensity, quantified testing of thermal and mechanical perception and pain, allodynia to brushing (area, intensity), neuropathic symptoms, clinical global impression, and quality of life. RESULTS: BTX-A treatment, relative to placebo, was associated with persistent effects on spontaneous pain intensity from 2 weeks after the injection to 14 weeks. These effects correlated with the preservation of thermal sensation at baseline (p < 0.05). BTX also improved allodynia to brush and decreased pain thresholds to cold, without affecting perception thresholds. There were sustained improvements in the proportion of responders (number needed to treat for 50% pain relief: 3.03 at 12 weeks), neuropathic symptoms, and general activity. Most patients reported pain during the injections, but there were no further local or systemic side effects. INTERPRETATION: These results indicate for the first time that BTX-A may induce direct analgesic effects in patients with chronic neuropathic pain independent of its effects on muscle tone and suggest novel indications for BTX-A in analgesia.

/pdf/botulinum-toxin-type-a-induces-direct-analgesic-effects-in-4ciy04eo0r.pdf

Botulinum toxin type A induces direct analgesic effects in chronic neuropathic pain.

Burn injury: Challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring

Thrombotic complications in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a meta-analysis of 17 prospective studies comprising 1752 pediatric patients

Substantial progress has been made during the last decades in our understanding of acute pain mechanisms, and this knowledge has encouraged the search for novel treatments. Of particular interest has been the observation that tissue injury initiates a number of modulations of both the peripheral and the central pain pathways, which convert the system from a 'physiological' to a 'pathological' mode of processing afferent information. Gabapentin, which binds to the alpha(2)delta subunit of the voltage-dependent calcium channel, is active in animal models of 'pathological' but not in models of 'physiological' pain. Consequently, attention has so far been focused on neuropathic pain as a target for the clinical use of gabapentin and analogues. Recently, several reports have indicated that gabapentin may have a place in the treatment of post-operative pain. This article presents a brief summary of the potential mechanisms of post-operative pain, and a systematic review of the available data of gabapentin and pregabalin for post-operative analgesia. It is concluded that the results with gabapentin and pregabalin in post-operative pain treatment published so far are promising. It is suggested that future studies should explore the effects of 'protective premedication' with combinations of various antihyperanalgesic and analgesic drugs for post-operative analgesia.

'Protective premedication': an option with gabapentin and related drugs? A review of gabapentin and pregabalin in the treatment of post-operative pain

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in acute leukemia. Incidence, risk factors, and impact on prognosis.

UNLABELLED It was our aim to study the within-day stability and between-day repeatability of ultraviolet B (UVB) light-induced primary and secondary hyperalgesia over 10 h Twenty hours after UVB irradiation of a skin spot (r = 25 cm) on the upper leg of 8 healthy volunteers the areas of secondary hyperalgesia to pinprick and pain tolerance thresholds to heat (HPTT) and electrical stimuli (5 and 250 Hz, electrical pain tolerance thresholds [EPTT]) were assessed Measurements were repeated for 10 h at 2-h intervals and in 2 different sessions Large areas of secondary hyperalgesia to pin prick were observed (5995 mm(2); SD, 1645) Primary hyperalgesia was evidenced by significant decreases of HPTT (mean difference, 65 degrees C; 95% confidence interval, 61-68; P < 0001) and EPTT at 250 Hz (mean difference, 045 mA; 95% confidence interval, 013-078; P < 005) compared to normal skin There was no trend within one session of either primary (P = 014 for HPTT) or secondary hyperalgesia (P = 095) and no difference between the two sessions (primary hyperalgesia, P = 028; secondary hyperalgesia, P = 007) The sunburn pain model provides a long time course of stable hyperalgesia with a high within-day stability and between-day repeatability for primary and secondary hyperalgesia IMPLICATIONS The sunburn pain model provides a long time course of stable hyperalgesia with a high within-day stability and between-day repeatability for primary and secondary hyperalgesia

The sunburn pain model: the stability of primary and secondary hyperalgesia over 10 hours in a crossover setting.

Aims Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are believed to counteract inflammation and inflammation-induced sensitization of nociceptors by inhibiting peripheral prostaglandin synthesis. We evaluated an experimental pain model for NSAIDs, that included an inflammatory component to mimic clinical inflammatory pain conditions.



Methods  The study was performed in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover design on 32 healthy volunteers. A small skin area of the proximal upper leg was irradiated with a UVB source using three times the individually estimated minimal erythema dose. Twenty hours after irradiation skin temperature, heat pain threshold and tolerance in sunburn spot were measured using a thermal sensory testing. These measurements were repeated 2 h after medication of either 800 mg ibuprofen as single oral dose or placebo capsules. Effects of ibuprofen on outcome parameters were assessed with analyses of covariance (ancova).



Results  Placebo did not affect heat pain threshold or tolerance. By contrast, ibuprofen increased heat pain threshold by 1.092 °C [confidence interval (CI) 0.498, 1.695; P = 0.0008) compared with placebo. Heat pain tolerance also increased significantly by 1.618 °C (CI 1.062, 2.175; P = 0.0001).



Conclusion  The pain model we evaluated was well tolerated in all subjects and the effects of ibuprofen were highly significant. This model is simple, sensitive to NSAIDs’ effects and therefore has potential for future experimental pain studies.

https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.0306-5251.2003.01869.x

A simple pain model for the evaluation of analgesic effects of NSAIDs in healthy subjects

UNLABELLED We tested the responsiveness of measures of hyperalgesia in a model of UVB-induced inflammatory hyperalgesia with remifentanil, gabapentin, and the combination of both drugs in a double-blinded, active placebo-controlled, 4-way-crossover design in 16 volunteers. A circular skin area was irradiated with UVB-light 20 h before the application of gabapentin (600 mg) and 2 h later remifentanil (0.08 microg.kg(-1).min(-1), 40 min). In the sunburn spots we observed stable decreases of the heat pain perception thresholds (HPPT, mean difference, 4.45 degrees C; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.32 degrees -5.59 degrees ) and heat pain tolerance thresholds (HPTT; mean difference, 5.43 degrees C; 95% CI, 4.50 degrees -6.35 degrees ) compared with normal skin. Further, large areas of mechanical hyperalgesia to pinprick adjacent to the erythema spots developed in all subjects. Overall remifentanil increased the HPPT (mean increase, 2.47 degrees C; 95% CI, 1.86 degrees -3.09 degrees, P < 0.001) and HPTT (mean increase, 3.18 degrees C; 95% CI, 2.65 degrees -3.71 degrees, P < 0.001) and reduced the area of secondary hyperalgesia by 59% (mean decrease, 5326 mm(2); 95% CI, 4233-6419 mm(2), P < 0.001) compared with placebo. In the sunburn remifentanil markedly increased the HPTT by 86% compared with normal skin (additional increase, 2.57 degrees C; 95% CI, 1.71 degrees -3.43 degrees). This different effect was not seen in the HPPT. With the exception of a small increase of HPTT in the sunburn (P = 0.02) gabapentin had no noticeable effect on either hyperalgesia. In conclusion, opioid analgesia was reliably demonstrated in this new extended pain model. IMPLICATIONS Opioid analgesia was reliably demonstrated in a new inflammatory model of primary and secondary hyperalgesia. Gabapentin showed no antihyperalgesic and no opioid-enhancing effect in this model.

The effects of remifentanil and gabapentin on hyperalgesia in a new extended inflammatory skin pain model in healthy volunteers.

The analysis of drug's influence on peripheral and central sensitisation can give useful information about its mode of action and can lead to more efficacy in the treatment of pain. Peripheral inflammation is associated with peripheral expression and up-regulation of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in the CNS. The relative contribution of COX-2 mediated central sensitisation may be prominent under inflammatory conditions. In this randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled cross-over trial the effects of multidoses of the COX-2 selective inhibitor rofecoxib on primary and secondary hyperalgesia were evaluated in the UVB pain model. Twenty-four hours after local UVB irradiation at the upper leg of 42 healthy volunteers heat pain perception (HPPT) and heat pain tolerance thresholds (HPTT) were assessed within the inflammation. The area of secondary hyperalgesia was determined by pin prick test. Subjects received oral rofecoxib 50, 250, 500 mg or placebo. Pain testing was repeated after 3 and 6 h. Compared to placebo, rofecoxib significantly increased HPPT (1.55 and 1.08 degrees C, P<0.0001 and P=0.0333), HPTT (1.74 and 1.58 degrees C, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001), and reduced the mean area of secondary hyperalgesia by 15.6% (P=0.007) and 16.8% (P<0.001) after 3 and 6 h. No significant difference between the three dosage groups was observed. These data confirm peripheral effects of rofecoxib in a human inflammatory UV-B pain model and provide circumstantial evidence that even a standard clinical dose of rofecoxib reduces central hyperalgesia in inflammatory pain. We confirm that the effect of single oral dose of rofecoxib plateaus at 50 mg.

Rofecoxib attenuates both primary and secondary inflammatory hyperalgesia: a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled crossover trial in the UV-B pain model.

Stephan Lehr

Papers

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in acute leukemia. Incidence, risk factors, and impact on prognosis.

The sunburn pain model: the stability of primary and secondary hyperalgesia over 10 hours in a crossover setting.

A simple pain model for the evaluation of analgesic effects of NSAIDs in healthy subjects

The effects of remifentanil and gabapentin on hyperalgesia in a new extended inflammatory skin pain model in healthy volunteers.

Rofecoxib attenuates both primary and secondary inflammatory hyperalgesia: a randomized, double blinded, placebo controlled crossover trial in the UV-B pain model.