scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Steven R. Oleson published in 2010"


Proceedings ArticleDOI
25 Jul 2010
TL;DR: In this article, a study was conducted to determine the cost viability of electric propulsion within the Discovery mission cost limitations, and cost trades were conducted for various propulsion system elements, solar array sizing, and mission duration.
Abstract: Electric propulsion has been identified as an enabling technology for a wide range of missions. The use of electric propulsion can significantly reduce the spacecraft mass and launch vehicle requirements resulting in large cost savings. Electric propulsion can enable what would be flagship chemical missions to fit within lower cost missions. However, electric propulsion is currently not considered cost competitive with state-of-the-art bipropellant systems providing reasonable, < 2 km/s, ΔV. The In-Space Propulsion Project is investing in the HIVHAC propulsion system specifically to provide a lower cost electric propulsion option. NASA’s Science Mission Directorate is also offering a cost incentive for the use of the NEXT ion propulsion system for the Discovery mission solicitation. To fully understand the cost constraints of applying these primary electric propulsion systems, a study was completed to determine the cost viability of electric propulsion within the Discovery Mission cost limitations. Cost trades have been conducted for various propulsion system elements, solar array sizing, and mission duration. Results of the cost viability trades are presented herein.

14 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, radioisotope electric propulsion (REP) has been shown to offer the performance advantages of traditional reactor-powered electric propulsion at large distances from the Sun, but with much smaller, affordable spacecraft.

9 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
25 Jul 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the feasibility and propulsion system requirements of a main belt asteroid sample return mission were evaluated and the mission design trades, results, and propulsion systems requirements were presented, as well as the propulsion system design trades and results.
Abstract: The Dawn spacecraft is on its way to rendezvous with two main belt asteroids, Ceres and Vesta. The science community is already anticipating compelling results that would dictate a sample return mission. Asteroid sample return missions are already highlighted in the Decadal Survey and are directly solicited through the New Frontiers mission announcement of opportunities. There have been numerous studies of near-Earth asteroid sample return missions. NASA’s In-Space Propulsion Technology project initiated a study to evaluate the feasibility and propulsion system requirements of main belt asteroid sample return missions. The mission design trades, results, and propulsion system requirements are presented.

8 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
25 Jul 2010
TL;DR: In this article, four design options were investigated: Chemical Return /solar electric propulsion (SEP) stage outbound, all-SEP, all chemical and chemical with aerobraking, and all SEP and chemical/aerobrake.
Abstract: The COMPASS Team was tasked with the design of a Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The current Mars sample return mission is a joint National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and European Space Agency (ESA) mission, with ESA contributing the launch vehicle for the Mars Sample Return Vehicle. The COMPASS Team ran a series of design trades for this Mars sample return vehicle. Four design options were investigated: Chemical Return /solar electric propulsion (SEP) stage outbound, all-SEP, all chemical and chemical with aerobraking. The all-SEP and Chemical with aerobraking were deemed the best choices for comparison. SEP can eliminate both the Earth flyby and the aerobraking maneuver (both considered high risk by the Mars Sample Return Project) required by the chemical propulsion option but also require long low thrust spiral times. However this is offset somewhat by the chemical/aerobrake missions use of an Earth flyby and aerobraking which also take many months. Cost and risk analyses are used to further differentiate the all-SEP and Chemical/Aerobrake options.

2 citations


01 Dec 2010
TL;DR: The COllaborative Modeling for the Parametric Assessment of Space Systems (COMPASS) team designed a robotic lunar Lander to deliver an unspecified payload (greater than zero) to the lunar surface for the lowest cost in this 2006 design study as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The COllaborative Modeling for the Parametric Assessment of Space Systems (COMPASS) team designed a robotic lunar Lander to deliver an unspecified payload (greater than zero) to the lunar surface for the lowest cost in this 2006 design study. The purpose of the low cost lunar lander design was to investigate how much payload can an inexpensive chemical or Electric Propulsion (EP) system deliver to the Moon s surface. The spacecraft designed as the baseline out of this study was a solar powered robotic lander, launched on a Minotaur V launch vehicle on a direct injection trajectory to the lunar surface. A Star 27 solid rocket motor does lunar capture and performs 88 percent of the descent burn. The Robotic Lunar Lander soft-lands using a hydrazine propulsion system to perform the last 10% of the landing maneuver, leaving the descent at a near zero, but not exactly zero, terminal velocity. This low-cost robotic lander delivers 10 kg of science payload instruments to the lunar surface.

2 citations


Proceedings ArticleDOI
25 Jul 2010
TL;DR: The HERRO concept allows real-time investigation of planets and small bodies by sending astronauts to orbit these targets and telerobotically explore them using robotic systems as mentioned in this paper, which is the goal of the Mars Exploration Vehicle (MEV).
Abstract: The HERRO concept allows real time investigation of planets and small bodies by sending astronauts to orbit these targets and telerobotically explore them using robotic systems. Several targets have been put forward by past studies including Mars, Venus, and near Earth asteroids. A conceptual design study was funded by the NASA Innovation Fund to explore what the HERRO concept and it's vehicles would look like and what technological challenges need to be met. This design study chose Mars as the target destination. In this way the HERRO studies can define the endpoint design concepts for an all-up telerobotic exploration of the number one target of interest Mars. This endpoint design will serve to help planners define combined precursor telerobotics science missions and technology development flights. A suggested set of these technologies and demonstrator missions is shown in Appendix B. The HERRO concept includes a crewed telerobotics orbit vehicle as well three Truck rovers, each supporting two teleoperated geologist robots Rockhounds (each truck/Rockhounds set is landed using a commercially launched aeroshell landing system.) Options include a sample ascent system teamed with an orbital telerobotic sample rendezvous and return spacecraft (S/C) (yet to be designed). Each truck rover would be landed in a science location with the ability to traverse a 100 km diameter area, carrying the Rockhounds to 100 m diameter science areas for several week science activities. The truck is not only responsible for transporting the Rockhounds to science areas, but also for relaying telecontrol and high-res communications to/from the Rockhound and powering/heating the Rockhound during the non-science times (including night-time). The Rockhounds take the place of human geologists by providing an agile robotic platform with real-time telerobotics control to the Rockhound from the crew telerobotics orbiter. The designs of the Truck rovers and Rockhounds will be described in other publications. This document focuses on the CTCV design.

1 citations


01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: The Human Exploration using Real-time Robotic Operations (HERRO) strategy as discussed by the authors focuses on sending piloted spacecraft and crews into orbit around exploration targets of interest, such as Mars, and conducting astronaut exploration of the surfaces using telerobots and remotely controlled systems.
Abstract: This paper presents an exploration strategy for human missions beyond Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and the Moon that combines the best features of human and robotic spaceflight. This “Human Exploration using Real-time Robotic Operations” (HERRO) strategy refrains from placing humans on the surfaces of the Moon and Mars in the near-term. Rather, it focuses on sending piloted spacecraft and crews into orbit around exploration targets of interest, such as Mars, and conducting astronaut exploration of the surfaces using telerobots and remotely controlled systems. By eliminating the significant communications delay with Earth due to the speed of light limit, teleoperation provides scientists real-time control of rovers and other sophisticated instruments, in effect giving them a “virtual presence” on planetary surfaces, and thus expanding the scientific return at these destinations. It also eliminates development of the numerous man-rated landers, ascent vehicles and surface systems that are required to land humans on planetary surfaces. The propulsive requirements to travel from LEO to many destinations with shallow gravity-wells in the inner solar system are quite similar. Thus, a single spacecraft design could perform a variety of missions, including orbit-based surface exploration of the Moon, Mars and Venus, and rendezvous with Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs), as well as Phobos and Deimos. Although HERRO bypasses many of the initial steps that have been historically associated with human space exploration, it opens the door to many new destinations that are candidates for future resource utilization and settlement. HERRO is a first step that takes humans to exciting destinations beyond LEO, while expanding the ability to conduct science within the inner solar system.